Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council January 28, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 8 <br />• Ms. Sandback asked if the flat rate was comparable to what the union employees receive. <br />City Administrator Miller indicated the union employees rate is comparable to the proposal for <br />the non-union employees. <br />Council Member Stigney indicated one of the City employees had called him to discuss some <br />issues and concerns and he had asked that the matter be added to the retreat agenda in February. <br />Ayes - 3 Nays - 1(Marty) Motion carried. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Marty. To Deny Item 6H as Presented. <br />Council Member Stigney commented that he did not feel it was appropriate that the Mayor had <br />asked to expend monies for an out of town convention when the City is concerned with <br />expenditures and cutting health insurance benefits for its employees. <br />Naja Werner agreed with Council Member Stigney's comment and said she feels the City should <br />be "tightening its belt" as everyone else is doing. She then commented that the City may have a <br />"lame duck" Mayor in light of all the negative publicity. She further commented that there are <br />wonderful educational opportunities in the twin cities and the Mayor should explore those <br />• options. <br />Council Member Marty said he was surprised that the Mayor had requested authorization for this <br />trip in light of the financial outlook for the City with the potential for more state aid cuts. He <br />commented that the money budgeted for the convention does not need to be spent just because it <br />is in the budget. He then commented that he does not think any Mayor or Council Member <br />within the last 10 years has incurred as many bills as the present Mayor. He further commented <br />that the Mayor spent $3,349.671ast year on two out of state conventions and he feels that is <br />totally out of line. <br />Mayor Sonterre explained that the basis for his request is that this has been an expenditure for as <br />far back as the City has been a member of the organization and noted in previous years the City <br />has sent two representatives to this convention. He commented that he serves a representative to <br />the National League of Cities on crime prevention and this meeting is one of two mandatory <br />meetings and there are four others that he does not attend because of the cost and a lack of <br />benefit to the City. He then commented that, unless you have been to one of these events and <br />gone through the training and informational seminars included in the registration fee, you would <br />not be in a position to discuss the benefits. <br />Council Member Thomas commented that there is a difference between what we need and what <br />is nice and even though she feels there is a benefit to attending the conventions the timing is not <br />right in light of the possibility of the loss of more funding sources. <br />