Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council February 25, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br />• handed out information on last year's sales as requested by Council. He further commented that <br />the Resolution had been amended to include a sentence requiring that the proceeds from the sales <br />of the vehicles would be put back into the City's vehicle account for budgeting. <br />Acting Chief Brennan reviewed last year's sales information with Council and indicated he feels <br />a reasonable price to expect is between $2,500 and $3,000 for the vehicles. <br />Mayor Sonterre asked whether the trade in value was considered dealer trade in value. <br />Acting Chief Brennan indicated the figures represented dealer trade in value. <br />Mayor Sonterre asked if the City should consider trying to sell the vehicles through the League <br />of Minnesota Cities because a list is sent out to member cities with all items for sale. <br />Acting Chief Brennan indicated he had seen the list of items for sale and it did not appear that <br />vehicles were moving very quickly as the list was the same month after month. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Marty. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 5715, a <br />Resolution Authorizing the Purchase of Two Police Vehicles. <br />Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />• E. Petition for the City Council to Hear the Grievance Filed by Marge Norquist <br />Jerry Serfling, Assistant Director for AFCSME 14, addressed Council and indicated that the <br />word grievance becomes adversarial and that is not the way the union looks at it, the union looks <br />at it as identifying the problem and establishing a procedure for resolving the problem. He then <br />indicated that the union objects to the removal or stoppage of payment for Ms. Norquist's retiree <br />Medicare healthcare supplement. He commented that Ms. Norquist is 72 years old and, as a <br />result of budget decisions her salary was cut in half as of January 1, 2002. He then commented <br />that during the collective bargaining the union discussed with the City the need, in the new <br />contract, to make sure that supplemental insurance payments were continued and, as a result of <br />that discussion, the City Administrator stopped payment and notified Ms. Norquist on January <br />25, 2002. <br />Mr. Serfling indicated that during negotiations there are certain things under the Minnesota <br />Collective Bargaining Law that are mandatory and should continue and, without any negotiation, <br />the City stopped the payment. He then indicated there is solution that is cheaper for the City and <br />would do no harm to Ms. Norquist. He further indicated that what the City is paying for is <br />cheaper than having Ms. Norquist enroll in the City provided insurance plan and having the City <br />pay the pro rated amount of the premium. <br />Mr. Serfling indicated, rather than see unions and employees as adversaries, this is an <br />• opportunity for the City to say it will not hurt people unnecessarily. He then commented that he <br />