My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2002/03/11
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
Minutes - 2002/03/11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2025 12:49:57 PM
Creation date
3/4/2025 12:49:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
3/11/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 11, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 14 <br />Council Member Marty pointed out that Ms. Reed had indicated during her presentation that the <br />salary is temporary and subject to change based on wage negotiations with the union. <br />Mr. Serfling indicated the law requires salaries to be bargained and this salary has not been <br />bargained so rehiring at last summer's wage would be appropriate. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Sonterre. To Call the Question. <br />Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />G. Consideration of Resolution 5706, a Resolution Revoking the Business <br />License for Gas `n Splash, Located at 2525 County Highway 10. <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated this matter was tabled at the February 25, <br />2002 meeting to allow the business owner to be in attendance when the matter was discussed. <br />He then explained the facility expanded its car wash and the Metropolitan Council had <br />determined that the expansion warranted a SAC charge of 41 units which amounts to $43,050.00 <br />which the City had to pay to the Metropolitan Council. <br />• Director Ericson indicated there has been correspondence back and forth among the parties <br />involved and the business owner contents that this is an unfair fee but the Metropolitan Council <br />has argued that the fee is set based on the capacity for water usage not actual water usage. <br />Director Ericson indicated he would like to give Mr. Mack, the business owner, the opportunity <br />to address Council and explain his position. He then indicated Staff is aware that revoking the <br />business license will not get the City paid any faster but the amount does need to be paid and this <br />is leverage the City can use to attempt to obtain payment. <br />Mayor Sonterre asked if there is a legal basis by which the City could enter into an agreement <br />with Mr. Mack to receive a portion of revenues generated until the amounts are paid. <br />City Attorney Riggs indicated the City could enter into a repayment agreement but said the <br />business owner has had that opportunity available to him for quite some time and it has not come <br />to fruition. He also noted the City could place the amount on the tax rolls to be directly <br />collected. <br />Mayor Sonterre asked whether one party has not agreed or whether an agreement had not been <br />discussed. <br />Director Ericson indicated that Staff has made attempts to enter into some type of negotiations <br />• with Mr. Mack and noted it was not until this year that Staff had spoken to Mr. Mack concerning <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.