My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2002/03/11
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
Minutes - 2002/03/11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2025 12:49:57 PM
Creation date
3/4/2025 12:49:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
3/11/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />~J <br />• <br />Mounds View City Council March 11, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 17 <br />small step would be to implement screening procedures while looking into funding the <br />surveillance cameras with park dedication fees. <br />Deputy Chief Brennan indicated that those on the Intranet would be able to see the video output <br />from the surveillance cameras but explained putting that data out onto the Internet would be an <br />added expense because a hosting site would need to be arranged. <br />Deputy Chief Brennan indicated Roseville was $60.00 over the lowest bid but he feels it would <br />be a good idea to go with Roseville because they would be supporting the system. <br />Council Member Stigney indicated there were two security vendors at the home and garden show <br />and asked whether either of them had contacted the police department. <br />Deputy Chief Brennan indicated that the two security vendors had contacted him. <br />Council Member Stigney asked whether the City should be looking at all the same equipment <br />when comparing vendors. <br />Deputy Chief Brennan indicated the camera with the best specs is a Sony and Roseville quoted <br />that one. He then said he was not sure how to compare the models because it was beyond his <br />expertise. <br />Council Member Stigney said it looked like there was a camera that had variable focal length. <br />Deputy Chief Brennan indicated one bid quoted different lenses and said he is not sure what type <br />of lens Roseville quoted. <br />Council Member Stigney noted the Roseville quote does not say anything about the lens. <br />Deputy Chief Brennan indicated he was not sure what type of lens Roseville was quoting but <br />said he had seen it in action on the Intranet. <br />Council Member Stigney indicated that Sony might have had this model and it was good last <br />year but there would be a new model for this year and he thinks somebody should look at that. <br />Deputy Chief Brennan indicated Mr. Hess would be working with the folks from Roseville to <br />make sure the equipment is as compatible as possible. <br />Council Member Stigney suggested getting the model numbers and shopping prices to get an <br />idea of the actual cost of the system. <br />Mayor Sonterre asked if it would be easier for Roseville to identify who they were buying <br />through. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.