Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council March 11, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 20 <br />• City Attorney Riggs indicated the data is not public and cannot be disseminated but the <br />information can be discussed at the meeting. <br />City Administrator Miller explained that the document is a ruling from the Minnesota <br />Department of Economic Security reversing its earlier decision to award unemployment benefits <br />to former employee Bruce Kessel. She then explained that the Minnesota Department of <br />Economic Security had previously ruled in favor of the former employee and that decision was <br />appealed by the City. <br />City Administrator Miller asked Council to turn to Page 3 of the document where she read the <br />reasons for the decision to reverse the previous ruling. They are as follows: *enter from <br />document. <br />City Administrator Miller then gave a brief overview indicating that the judge found that the <br />applicant was discharged because of employment misconduct and the unemployment judge <br />found that the employee had the training and experience to perform his duties adequately and <br />either chose to create an inadequate accounting system or did not care and his hostility or lack of <br />concern for the employer constitutes misconduct. She further indicated there were 12 findings <br />elaborated in the report and noted briefly that the judge mentions the issue of credit cards, the <br />overuse of credit cards, and the number of cards issued. <br />Council Member Quick asked to have the findings of fact read. <br />City Administrator Miller read the findings of fact from the document. They are as follows: <br />(1) The applicant worked full-time for the employer from July 8, 199b until June 7, 2001 as <br />finance director for a final hourly wage of $33.80. <br />(2) The employer is a Minnesota City. <br />(3) It was the applicant's job to design and administer accounting systems that would <br />accurately show the income and expenditures of the employer. It was also the applicant's <br />job to provide other city officials with financial information that they needed to <br />administer to their departments. <br />(4) The applicant has been a CPA for several years. Before he was hired for this position, the <br />applicant worked several years in the finance department of another Minnesota city. <br />(5) It is very unusual for a Minnesota city to issue more than one or two credit cards to <br />employees for the purchase of merchandise for the city. When the applicant started <br />working for the employer, the employer had issued one credit card to an employee. <br />During the applicant's employment, he issued credit cards to more and more employees. <br />At the time of the applicant's discharge, more than 20 city employees had credit cards <br />they could use to charge purchases against the employer. Two individuals who were not <br />city employees also had city credit cards. The number of credit cards made it impossible <br />for the city to check each purchase to insure that it was for an authorized city purchase. <br />There were employees who used city credit cards to make personal purchases and did not <br />