My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2002/03/25
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
Minutes - 2002/03/25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2025 12:50:21 PM
Creation date
3/4/2025 12:50:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
3/25/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 25, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 14 <br />D. Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance 692, an Ordinance Amending <br />Section 1006.06 of the Mounds View City Code Pertaining to Development <br />Controls <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Thomas. To Waive the Reading, Approve the Second Reading and <br />Adopt Ordinance 692, an Ordinance Amending Section 1006.06 of the Mounds View City Code <br />Pertaining to Development Controls. <br />ROLL CALL: Marty/Stigney/Thomas/Quick/Sonterre. <br />Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />E. First Reading of Ordinance 695, an Ordinance Renaming a Disconnected <br />Section of County Road J <br />Planner Atkinson indicated this matter had been discussed at the work session and noted there <br />are a few options for the renaming. He then indicated he had determined that there would be an <br />issue with using 85th Avenue because the new alignment is 85th Avenue. He further indicated he <br />had polled the 8 residents involved and four residents like Old County Road J, three residents <br />liked Long Lake Road, and one resident said the City is wasting time and money discussing it. <br />Mayor Sonterre indicated a resident had come to the meeting to express his opinion but had left <br />due to the closed session. He then indicated that the resident expressed his strong opinion that it <br />made the most sense to rename the street Long Lake Road and he feels that residents will have to <br />change their addresses to include a name change so the number should not be that big of a deal. <br />Council Member Thomas asked if the street is renamed Old County Road J whether residents <br />need to change their addresses. <br />Planner Atkinson indicated it would be appropriate to change the addresses. <br />Planner Atkinson indicated that both the Public Works Director and Community Development <br />Director prefer renaming the street Long Lake Road. <br />Council Member Stigney said he preferred Long Lake Road. <br />Council Member Quick agreed. <br />Council Member Marty agreed. <br />Council Member Thomas agreed. <br />A resident in the audience commented that this would be the third time he has changed the <br />number on his house. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.