My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2002/05/13
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
Minutes - 2002/05/13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2025 12:51:25 PM
Creation date
3/4/2025 12:51:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
5/13/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council May 13, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br />Council Member Marty commented that there was a lawsuit associated with the golf course and <br />the City lost the lawsuit against the developer due to knowledge that was possessed by some <br />individuals in the City which cost the City $300,000. <br />City Attorney Riggs clarified that the City actually won the lawsuit but it cost more in attorney's <br />fees than what the City won. <br />Council Member Marty indicated that, if the lawsuit had not cost the City $300,000, Springstead <br />has said that the course actually made more money than it was predicted to make. He further <br />commented that the course has been making money but cannot catch up because of the initial <br />$300,000 in attorney's fees. <br />City Administrator Miller commented that the numbers referenced by Springstead were given to <br />them by the former finance director and the former golf course manager and, therefore, are <br />questionable in validity. <br />Frank Blaziak of 2361 LaPort Drive said if the course is making money settle the strike and get <br />everyone back to work because without the workers there would be no profit. <br />David Jahnke commented that for the first five years the course did not have to make any <br />payments but, as soon as those payments needed to be made, the taxpayers were asked to pay the <br />bills which says to him that the course is not making a profit. If it were, residents would not be <br />footing the bill. <br />Michelle Sandback of 2356 Sherwood Road said there have been numerous lawsuit related issues <br />pertaining to the golf course. She then said she would like to have the names of the cities that the <br />striking employees live in so that she can call and find out how much those residents are paying <br />for health insurance for the employees of the City they live in to compare it with what the <br />employees are asking the residents of Mounds View to pay. <br />City Attorney Riggs indicated that the data practices law does not allow the City to disclose the <br />homes of employees because that is not subject to public review like positions and job titles. He <br />then said that she could ask the employees herself if she wished. <br />Ms. Sandback asked the employees to either tell her how much they pay in their cities for their <br />employees insurance or tell her which city they live in so she could call and find out. <br />Mary Tatarek, 11162 Nassau Circle, Blaine commented that the AFSCME employees are simply <br />asking for the same medical that the other unions within the City get. She then said they are <br />asking for equality in Mounds View. <br />Bruce Broeffel indicated it seems the City is under the impression the golf course employees are <br />asking for more money but all they are asking for is their jobs back. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.