My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2002/08/12
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
Minutes - 2002/08/12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2025 12:53:49 PM
Creation date
3/4/2025 12:53:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
8/12/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council August 12, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 9 <br />Acting Chief Brennan indicated that 48 hours are required every three years. He then said that <br />the only two not provided by this program are firearms training and pursuit driving. <br />Council Member Marty asked if this was a budgeted item. <br />Acting Chief Brennan indicated the amount was in the budget. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Stigney. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 5807, a <br />Resolution Authorizing the Renewal of Police Training Contract with Century College. <br />Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />E. Resolution 5811 Awarding the Construction Contract for the Hillview Park <br />Shelter Building <br />MOTION/SECOND: Thomas/Sonterre. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 5811, <br />Awarding the Construction Contract for the Hillview Park Shelter Building. <br />Council Member Stigney commented that this contract would be for the relocation of the air <br />conditioning unit to the attic space and it is being bid separately. <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated that Eberts does not do that type of work and the better <br />i location would be up in the attic so the City is looking for other contractors to do the work. <br />Council Member Stigney commented that, since it is on the ground and should not have been and <br />there was an architect out there he would like to know if there is any liability on the part of the <br />architect for placing it there. <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated that he is not sure why the architect in this case would have <br />designed it this way and he feels the design is questionable. <br />Council Member Stigney asked if the City contacted the designer to them to pay to relocate the <br />air conditioning unit. <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated he had not done so and said he feels the same frustration <br />with what he feels is a substandard design. He then said he would call the architect and ask for <br />assistance with paying for the project. <br />Council Member Quick questioned who determined putting the air conditioner inside under the <br />roof was a good idea. <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated that several contractors looked at it and determined that <br />putting it in the attic was the best option. He then said that it would be in the gable end and air <br />would be pulled in to cool the condenser and this is a very common design. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.