My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2002/09/23
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
Minutes - 2002/09/23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2025 1:09:07 PM
Creation date
3/4/2025 1:09:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
9/23/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council September 23, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated he had pulled the elevation contour maps <br />and it shows that the wetland basin is located at 885 feet and the house is to be located between <br />894 and 896 so it would be constructed above the minimum building elevation. <br />Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />7. COUNCIL BUSINESS <br />A. Public Hearing to Consider Resolution 5847, a Resolution Approving a <br />Conditional Use Permit for Joint Facilities Parking and a Development Review <br />for Abbey Carpet, to be Located at 2214 County Highway 10. <br />Mayor Sonterre opened the public hearing at 7:34 p.m. <br />Planner Atkinson indicated the applicants had requested a development review and conditional <br />use permit to construct a building located on Highway 10 on the old Perkins site. He then said <br />the building would consist of 21,809 square feet and noted the lot is irregularly shaped. <br />Planner Atkinson indicated that Staff had gone through the requirements for a development <br />review in the Staff report and they have all been met. <br />Planner Atkinson indicated the parking requirement for this building is 94 spaces. He then <br />explained that the site plan calls for the use of the 15% proof of parking and an additiona132 <br />stalls of offsite parking through a conditional use permit to allow for joint facilities parking with <br />the Mermaid. <br />Planner Atkinson indicated that Council could waive the requirement of a development <br />agreement if it feels one is not necessary. Otherwise, the requirement of a development <br />agreement would be added to the Resolution. <br />Planner Atkinson noted the applicant had brought a color rendering of the building to show <br />Council. <br />Mayor Sonterre asked if the negotiations surrounding the parking arrangements were amicable or <br />if there were any anticipated problems with working it out. <br />The Applicant indicated there was already a joint facilities agreement in place for Perkins and it <br />is being changed slightly to fit their situation. <br />Council Member Marty asked what the advantages would be to requiring a development <br />agreement. <br />Planner Atkinson explained that the development agreement provides controls to ensure that the <br />development is constructed in the manner approved by Council. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.