My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2002/12/09
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
Minutes - 2002/12/09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2025 1:12:46 PM
Creation date
3/4/2025 1:11:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
12/9/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council December 9, 2002 <br />Regular Meeting Page 23 <br />and was told that he could not because he could only use 16 hours in a pay period so his request <br />was denied. <br />Council Member Thomas indicated that there are two different issues being discussed. In the <br />case of the former police chief he was attempting to work less hours. She then said that the <br />discussion was getting into issues not fully understood by Council. <br />City Administrator Miller said she finds it curious that Council Member Marty would speak in <br />support of clean up when he never once supported clean up and she has received nothing but <br />harassment from him since she recommended that the golf course manager be terminated. <br />Council Member Marty said he would like to know what Ms. Miller meant by harassment. <br />City Administrator Miller indicated Council Member Marty would be receiving a letter to that <br />effect. <br />Council Member Stigney commented that, whenever an item is brought to Council's attention, it <br />is corrected. He then said that Council hired an administrator to ensure that policies are carried <br />out and not bringing the issues forward to Council is puzzling. <br />Finance Director Hansen indicated there is a matter of interpretation that he is not clear on. He <br />then asked if it is a strict absolute that only 16 hours can be used in apay-period. <br />Council Member Stigney indicated that flex time is to be used in increments of 16 hours in a two <br />week period and that is clear. <br />Council Member Marty said yes. <br />Council Member Quick said no, if you went over 16 hours in one given week the potential is you <br />would never be able to recover the time. He then said it does not work that way and that was not <br />the intent of the Council. <br />Council Member Stigney commented the issue is not comp time it is flex-time. <br />Council Member Quick indicated he was not sure what Council Member Stigney is trying to <br />prove here but that is how he interprets it. He then said he finds it disheartening that he cannot <br />say anything without Council Member Stigney interrupting him. <br />Council Member Marty indicated he that the personnel policy states how it is to be administered <br />in black and white. <br />Council Member Stigney indicated all Council Members have been elected to uphold ordinances <br />and if there is an issue it should be brought to Council and straightened out. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.