Minutes - 2003/03/10 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View City Council March 10, 2003 Regular Meeting Page 10 Finance Director Hansen explained that Lakeside Park is the park that is on border with Spring Lake Park and the two cities jointly operate it with each City taking on certain responsibilities for maintenance. The City of Spring Lake Park assumes the physical maintenance and makes use of city equipment to maintain the park, keeps track of hours and bills the City for usage of that equipment at commercial rental rates. Council Member Gunn asked if the County Road H2 project was nearly completed. Public Works Director Lee indicated that the final wear course, boulevard restoration and pathway on the north side still needed to be completed. Mayor Linke asked Mr. Ericson to contact the State Auditor for clarification on the gala expenditure. MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Gunn. To Approve Just and Correct Claims as Presented. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. 8. CONSENT AGENDA A. Resolution 5961 Approving a Supplemental Letter Agreement with SEH for work associated with the Water Tower Rehabilitation Project B. Set a Public Hearing for 7:05 PM, Monday, March 24, 2003, to Consider an Appeal of the Planning Commission's Denial of a Variance Request Made by the Property Owners of 2075 Hillview Road, Planning Case VR03-001 C. Set a Public Hearing for 7:10 PM, Monday, March 24, 2003, to Consider the Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance 710, an Ordinance Amending Chapter 1111 of the Mounds View Zoning Code Pertaining to Permitted Uses in the R-O Zoning District, Planning Case TX03-001 D. Set a Public Hearing for 7:15 PM, Monday, March 24, 2003, to Consider a "No Parking" Request on the East Side of Greenfield Avenue 350 Feet South from County Road I Council Member Marty requested that Item A be removed for discussion. MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Gunn. To Approve Consent Agenda Items B, C, and D as Presented. Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. Council Member Marty expressed concern that the engineering estimate was much lower than the actual costs for the project. He then said that he would like Staff to ensure that engineering estimates are carefully reviewed in the past so that the amounts are closer to the actual amount.