My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2003/03/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
Minutes - 2003/03/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2025 12:52:52 PM
Creation date
3/5/2025 12:09:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
3/10/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 10, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 25 <br />Interim City Administrator Ericson indicated the Planning Commission is working on the <br />pawnshop ordinance. <br />Interim City Administrator Ericson indicated there is a house at 7741 Long Lake Road that is <br />being constructed in the setback and the City has posted a stop work order and contacted the <br />developer and property owner. He then said there was an error on the City's part when the <br />building permit was approved and Staff will be working with the developer and property owner <br />to either apply for a variance or cut 10 feet off the garage. <br />Interim City Administrator Ericson indicated that the City had received an offer of settlement <br />from MetroCom Wireless outside of the bankruptcy proceedings and the City's Attorney has <br />recommended accepting the amount. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Marty. To Accept the $3,500 Settlement Offer from MetroCom <br />Wireless. <br />Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />Interim City Administrator Ericson indicated the compensation study needs further refinement as <br />three positions did not show up in the study and Staff would like to see some other items <br />• addressed. <br />Mayor Linke indicated this item should be discussed during the budget work session. <br />Council Member Stigney indicated he did not like the policy and would like to know what other <br />cities use the Stanton 6 for maximum salary. He then said he would like to know why Staff has <br />gone back to using the Stanton mean of all group six cities when it was reported to Council that <br />there was a subset of 10 cities that Staff was basing salary on. He also asked for the per capita <br />cost and what the other cities tax capacity is as he does not like being compared to cities up to <br />25,000 when what they have for income has nothing to do with the City of Mounds View. <br />Interim City Administrator Ericson clarified that Council would like Staff to contact all other <br />Stanton 6 cities to determine who has this policy. <br />Council Member Stigney indicated he wanted to know who uses the Stanton mean for their <br />hiring. <br />Interim City Administrator Ericson indicated he would be happy to look into it but said he is not <br />sure why the City did not go with the subset but that can be discussed along with the other <br />personnel policy issues. He then commented that he would not have time to research the tax <br />capacity issue and suggested using an outside entity for that research. <br />• Council Member Stigney asked where the report from Labor Relations was that cost the City <br />$3,900. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.