Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council June 23, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 16 <br />1 <br />2 Council Member Stigney indicated he understood that it was when the license holder came up for <br />3 renewal that the City wanted to change the district. He then suggested that the City take a <br />4 broader approach and create the district not only for pawnshops but for related businesses as <br />5 well. <br />7 There was consent on the $10,000 fee and to look at an overlay district. <br />9 Mayor Linke indicated he would go with the south side. <br />10 <br />11 Richard Sonterre of 5060 Red Oak Drive thanked Council for its interest in the overlay district <br />12 and said that his understanding of the situation is that the reason there was an issue is because <br />13 they singled out a specific type of business and it ran akin to spot zoning. He then said he would <br />14 support the area to the north of Highway 10 because there are no residential structures, no <br />15 churches and no schools in the area. He further commented that he did not think there was <br />16 another geographical location in the City that would provide this type of separation. <br />17 <br />18 Council Member Marty indicated that is why he would prefer the north side. <br />19 <br />20 Council Member Gunn asked if there is buildable space in the area. <br />21 <br />•22 Interim City Administrator Ericson indicated there was not but noted there is rentable space in <br />23 the area. <br />24 <br />25 J. Consideration of a Development Review Request for LandCor Development <br />26 <br />27 Interim City Administrator Ericson indicated that this item is on the agenda as it failed on a two <br />28 to two vote at the last meeting. He then said that the PUD was successfully amended to allow for <br />29 this type of use and all of the requirements have been met. He also indicated that while the <br />3o Planning Commission would have preferred to have a restaurant on that location the market has <br />31 proven that the site is not suitable for that and they are supportive of this plan. <br />32 <br />33 Interim City Administrator Ericson indicated that at the last meeting Resolution 6033 failed on a <br />34 vote of two to two so no action was taken and Staff brings this before Council for consideration <br />35 and recommends approval of the project. He then indicated that a representative of LandCor <br />36 Development was in attendance to answer any questions. <br />~~ <br />• <br />