Laserfiche WebLink
• 1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />to <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />2 <br />~1 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />~3 <br />4 <br />Mounds View City Council November 10, 2003 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br />C. Resolution 6132, a Resolution Hiring Steven Vacek as the Public Works <br />Mechanic <br />D. Resolution 6133, a Resolution Approving a Sewer Connection and Maintenance <br />Agreement with Metropolitan Council Environmental Services <br />E. Establish an Executive Session Immediately Following the Meeting to Review <br />Contract Negotiations <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Gunn. To Approve the Consent Agenda as Presented. <br />Ayes - 5 <br />Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />9. COUNCIL BUSINESS <br />A. Mounds View Banquet Center Interim Agreement <br />City Administrator Ulrich indicated that the settlement agreement with the caterer has the vendor <br />leaving on November 11, 2003 and an RFP was done for Mounds View businesses that had <br />liquor and catering licenses to submit proposals to take over the service starting on November 12, <br />2003. He then indicated that three businesses qualify, The Mermaid, Roberts and Jakes and <br />proposals were received from Roberts and The Mermaid. <br />City Administrator Ulrich requested that Council discuss the proposals and accept one of them. <br />He then said that the agreement had been amended to include language that the City is not <br />obligated to reimburse the manager for events booked beyond the 60 day period once the <br />manager has been terminated and the manager agrees not to schedule any events at the banquet <br />center after having been terminated. <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman briefly reviewed the proposals with Council. <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman indicated that Staff had reviewed the proposals <br />using seven criteria. He then said that both businesses have said they are willing to have an on <br />site individual at the banquet center thought it was not a requirement under the RFP. He also <br />indicated that the Waste family has a number of people with a lot of good experience with <br />marketing and sales and The Mermaid has six people with good experience with marketing, sales <br />and catering. <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman indicated that the edge goes to The Mermaid in <br />sales and marketing plan as information on marketing activities was provided for all 12 months <br />of the year. The Roberts proposal discussed some months but not all 12. <br />Economic Development Coordinator Backman indicated that both businesses prefer to go with <br />the minimum monthly rate of $6,000 per month beginning in January of 2004 but Roberts had an <br />additional amount that is 5% of food sales excluding liquor and that would be approximately an <br />additional $10,000 per year. <br />45 <br />