My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2004/01/12
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
Minutes - 2004/01/12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2025 1:25:20 PM
Creation date
3/5/2025 1:25:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
1/12/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
~- - - <br />Mounds View City Council January 12, 2004 <br />Regular Meeting Page 15 <br />Ma or Linke indicated he was su estin the two to one tree replacement. <br />Y gg g <br />Council Member Stigney indicated there is no written wording within the City to require two to <br />one replacement. <br />Mr. Kuhl of 5176 Longview said he believes the Minnesota Wetland Regulations do suggest, if <br />not regulate, two to one replacement. <br />Mayor Linke explained that is wetland replacement but that is not replacement of the trees. <br />Mr. Kuhl indicated that in 1974 residents came to a different Council because there was a <br />commercial development proposed on Silver Lake Road with the utility entrances on Longview <br />and residents had 485 signatures that said please do not do that. And, at that time, there was a <br />Ramsey County Greenspace Group and that is why Ms. Koziak understood this ground was not <br />to be touched. He then said that there is also an easement on the west side of Longview for an <br />interpark trail and suggested the City look into it. <br />Council Member Quick asked for a review of any added conditions. <br />Council Member Gunn indicated she agreed with Council Member Marty that the City is not <br />. thrilled with this but the conditions that are listed will control whether or not this is a doable <br />development. <br />Ms. Koziak asked if the hydrology report refers to the ability of the ground to support the home. <br />Mayor Linke indicated that the soil boring test would determine whether the soils could support a <br />home. <br />Jonathon Thomas of 8040 Groveland Road indicated he has a background in these types of <br />projects and, if the citizens petition the Planning Commission and City Council to reconsider the <br />variance on the other project, could the plan be revised by the developer. <br />Mayor Linke indicated the developer can do whatever he wants. <br />Mr. Thomas commented that if the only reason the plan was denied was because of the 125 foot <br />lot requirements, if petitioned, the City could reconsider. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Stigney. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 6145, a <br />Resolution Approving the Preliminary Plat for Longview Estates Major Subdivision. <br />Council Member Stigney commented that based upon the developer following the requirements <br />of the City Code there is no basis for denying the preliminary plat approval. <br />• Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.