Laserfiche WebLink
~- - - <br />Mounds View City Council January 12, 2004 <br />Regular Meeting Page 15 <br />Ma or Linke indicated he was su estin the two to one tree replacement. <br />Y gg g <br />Council Member Stigney indicated there is no written wording within the City to require two to <br />one replacement. <br />Mr. Kuhl of 5176 Longview said he believes the Minnesota Wetland Regulations do suggest, if <br />not regulate, two to one replacement. <br />Mayor Linke explained that is wetland replacement but that is not replacement of the trees. <br />Mr. Kuhl indicated that in 1974 residents came to a different Council because there was a <br />commercial development proposed on Silver Lake Road with the utility entrances on Longview <br />and residents had 485 signatures that said please do not do that. And, at that time, there was a <br />Ramsey County Greenspace Group and that is why Ms. Koziak understood this ground was not <br />to be touched. He then said that there is also an easement on the west side of Longview for an <br />interpark trail and suggested the City look into it. <br />Council Member Quick asked for a review of any added conditions. <br />Council Member Gunn indicated she agreed with Council Member Marty that the City is not <br />. thrilled with this but the conditions that are listed will control whether or not this is a doable <br />development. <br />Ms. Koziak asked if the hydrology report refers to the ability of the ground to support the home. <br />Mayor Linke indicated that the soil boring test would determine whether the soils could support a <br />home. <br />Jonathon Thomas of 8040 Groveland Road indicated he has a background in these types of <br />projects and, if the citizens petition the Planning Commission and City Council to reconsider the <br />variance on the other project, could the plan be revised by the developer. <br />Mayor Linke indicated the developer can do whatever he wants. <br />Mr. Thomas commented that if the only reason the plan was denied was because of the 125 foot <br />lot requirements, if petitioned, the City could reconsider. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Stigney. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 6145, a <br />Resolution Approving the Preliminary Plat for Longview Estates Major Subdivision. <br />Council Member Stigney commented that based upon the developer following the requirements <br />of the City Code there is no basis for denying the preliminary plat approval. <br />• Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />