Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council Apri112, 2004 <br />Regular Meeting Page 15 <br />Finance Director Hansen indicated that this Resolution formalizes the agreement to have ICMA <br />administrate the plan but no one would be able to contribute to it until Council approves it <br />through the personnel manual and labor contracts. <br />Council Member Quick asked whether this would affect the contract negotiations in any way. <br />City Administrator Ulrich indicated it allows other options to include with the contract when <br />talking about sick leave severance with some unions. He then said that this could be an option to <br />sick leave severance payments. <br />Council Member Stigney asked what this compares to. <br />Finance Director Hansen indicated the only other plan available is through the state of Minnesota <br />but that plan is much more restrictive as an entire group of employees would be required to <br />contribute and this plan allows for individuals to make their own choice. <br />Council Member Stigney asked what other cities already use this plan. He then indicated he <br />would like to know who is using this. <br />Finance Director Hansen agreed to obtain the information for Council. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Quick/Gunn. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 6228, a <br />• Resolution Authorizing the Adoption of the Vantagecare Retirement Health Savings Program. <br />Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />Council Member Stigney abstained from voting. <br />J. First Reading and Introduction of Ordinance 734, an Ordinance Amending <br />Chapter 513 Pertaining to Adult Oriented Businesses. <br />Community Development Director Ericson indicated that the only change made from the work <br />session was a change in the fee from $500 to $2,500 as recommended by Kennedy and Graven <br />that the City's fee may be too low. <br />Council Member Stigney asked why the fee is restricted to $2,500. <br />Director Ericson commented that the higher the fee the more apt it is to be challenged and the fee <br />needs to be reasonable. <br />Council Member Stigney asked if the $2,500 is the most practical that the City should be <br />charging at this time. <br />• Director Ericson said he feels this is a fee that the City can justify at this time. <br />