My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2004/04/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
Minutes - 2004/04/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2025 1:48:42 PM
Creation date
3/5/2025 1:48:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
4/26/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council Apri126, 2004 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated he has not done a cost benefit analysis but does feel there <br />will be some benefit. <br />Council Member Quick asked if it would be better to condemn that one house in the long run and <br />put in a pond. <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated he has not discussed this with the DNR but there may be a <br />grant available to help with the installation costs. <br />Council Member Stigney asked if there is an opportunity to have Spring Lake Park share in the <br />costs. <br />Public Works Director Lee indicated that the bulk of the drainage is coming from Mounds View. <br />Mayor Linke asked that these comments be brought up at the public hearing for the benefit of <br />residents. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Linke. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 6232, a <br />Resolution Setting an Assessment Hearing Date of May 24, 2004, Authorizing the Advertisement <br />for the Hearing, Declaring Cost to be Assessed, and Ordering the Preparation of Proposed <br />Assessment for the 2003 Street Improvement Project. <br />F. Resolution 6231 Step Increase for David Parker <br />Mayor Linke read Resolution 6231. <br />Council Member Stigney asked that the Resolution be revised to reflect that there is only one <br />employee and to correct the hiring dates. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Many. To Postpone to the Next Council Meeting. <br />Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />G. Resolution 6230 Amending the 2003 Budgets for the General Fund and <br />Police Special Revenue Funds. <br />Council Member Many asked what the police forfeiture special revenue fund is for. <br />Finance Director Hansen indicated the police grants' special revenue fund is used to account for <br />state and federal grants including the juvenile accountability incentive block grant. He then said <br />that some officers time was incorrectly coded to the general fund rather than the grant fund. <br />Finance Director Hansen indicated that each year when there is a grant fund and forfeiture the <br />City puts in a nominal amount of spending that the City expects to have and then Staff comes to <br />Council for specific purchases or grants. In this case, there were items that ended up exceeding <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.