Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council June 28, 2004 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br />Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried. <br />• <br />J. .Resolution 6292 Approving and Authorizing the Execution of a Letter <br />Agreement with TINA for the Groveland Park Building Replacement <br />Project. <br />Council Member Marty stated he had received calls regarding the high cost for simply a cinder <br />block building. <br />Council Member Stigney stated the staff report had said it was assumed the building would use <br />the same general plans as the Hillview building with some minor modification. He asked why <br />they were asking for $19,600. <br />Public Works Director Lee stated he had made the assumption they could use the same plans <br />over again, which was true to some degree. He stated there is going to be a lot of expense in <br />terms of coming up with a site plan for the building and also doing the topographic layout for the <br />building. He stated they would also be doing some minor modifications to the building, so they <br />are looking at a lot of drafting time to redo the plans. He stated the City would not be realizing <br />the cost savings that he had thought would be the case. He pointed out that they had budgeted <br />$20,000 for this work. <br />Council Member Stigney asked whether they had gotten estimates from anyone else. <br />i <br />Public Works Director Lee stated they had not. <br />Council Member Stigney stated he had a problem with the cost of the project since the building <br />was almost the same as the other one. <br />Public Works Director Lee stated that if you took into account the inflation factor in the last four <br />years, the cost of the project could have been more than $23,000 - $24,000. <br />Mayor Linke pointed out some provisions in the contract that he found unsatisfactory, including <br />TKDA stating they were only going to provide three hard copy sets of the contract documents. <br />He stated he would like to see a list of what their principals and techs make. He stated the <br />contract states the City would be charged for reimbursables, but it doesn't specify what the <br />reimbursables are and what those costs will be. He stated in the general provisions for <br />architectural, where it says, "outstanding professional technical services with a cost defined as <br />amounts billed for extras, plus 10 percent," he would like to see that number at 5 percent. He <br />also stated that the floppy disk they receive should be reusable for longer than 30 days. He stated <br />he would like to get estimates from others. <br />MOTIONfSECOND. Marty/Gunn. To disapprove Resolution No. 6292. <br />Mayor Linke stated he would rather see a postponement of this item rather than rejection at this <br />. time to let staff go back and discuss it. <br />