Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council January 24, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br />• more complicated than just adopting a new fee schedule, but this is what is required of them <br />through Minnesota Statutes. He stated that if the fees are not sufficient to cover all the work <br />and all the fees that the City incurs, the applicant is responsible for the fees above and beyond <br />the application fee. <br />Mayor Marty noted that some of the fees had increased from the last reading somewhat in order <br />to cover City Staff costs. <br />Council Member Stigney asked if these were in accordance with M.S. 16B.62, Subd. 1. <br />City Attorneys Riggs stated he would have to look at that. <br />Council Member Flaherty asked if they were going to make it clear that this was a minimum fee, <br />and it might not be sufficient to cover the costs. <br />Director Ericson stated that it will vary substantially from project to project, so it's difficult for <br />staff, at the time they accept an application, to give the applicant a heads up of what the <br />additional fees might be. He stated that they will be signing a disclaimer indicating that they will <br />be responsible for any costs relative to the processing of their application above and beyond the <br />application fee. <br />City Attorney Riggs stated that in response to Council Member Stigney's question, that Chapter <br />• 16 is actually for building code fees, and so that is different from what they are adopting <br />here, which are land use type fees and development type fees. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Flaherty. To approve Ordinance 754, an Ordinance Establishing <br />Planning and Development Fees, and to waive the reading. <br />ROLL CALL: Marty/Stigney/Gunn/Flaherty. <br />Ayes-4 Nays-0 Motion carried. <br />B. 7:10 pm. Public Hearing and Consideration of the Second Reading and <br />Adoption of Ordinance 757, an Ordinance Vacating an Unused and Ezcess <br />Utility Easement Associated with 8265 Spring Lake Road. (ROLL CALL <br />VOTE) -Ericson. <br />Director Ericson stated that this Ordinance is in relation to a minor subdivision application for <br />the property at 8265 Spring Lake Road. He stated there was a lot line adjustment between the <br />Raninski property and the property to the north. He stated that there was a perimeter drainage <br />and utility easement around the periphery of the lot, which upon adjustment of the lot line was no <br />longer consistent with the periphery of the lot, so the Raninski's executed a new drainage and <br />utility easement consistent with the new property lines. He stated that that had been sent to <br />• Alabama for consent of the mortgage holder, and they had signed it and returned it. He stated <br />that this is a slightly different version from what was seen at the first reading in that they had <br />