My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2005/03/14
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Minutes - 2005/03/14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2025 4:14:02 PM
Creation date
3/5/2025 4:14:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
3/14/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 14, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 8 <br />Mr. Rudnik stated he is in support of the street project, and the streets need to be redone, but the • <br />biggest issue is finding a solution for the ponding that doesn't destroy everything. <br />Mr. Amundsen stated he didn't understand why this section of town was being done right now <br />when there were other sections in the city where the streets were in worse condition than his <br />neighborhood. <br />Kimberly Christ, 2824 Woodale Drive, stated that it was time to stand up against the Rice Creek <br />Watershed District. She also stated that she is definitely opposed to the sidewalks. She stated <br />she agreed with the comments made about the dangerous parking situation at the church. <br />Mayor Marty closed the public hearing. <br />Council Member Stigney asked whether there were areas of the city that had streets in worse <br />condition than this azea. <br />Public Works Director Lee stated that some of the areas slated for 2006 were in worse condition <br />than this area that was slated for 2005. <br />Council Member Stigney asked if the main factor was the contractor's proximity to the 2004 <br />project, regardless of whether they were bidding for the 2005 project or not. <br />Public Works Director Lee stated that another factor was that the Ci Council had wanted to • <br />look at doing a larger project in 2004, and at that time they were using the 1999 pavement <br />condition indexes, and since that time those have been updated. <br />Council Member Stigney stated it would have been preferable to have asked on the feedback <br />form whether they were in favor of concrete curb or bituminous, but his personal opinion was <br />that if it was only a $186 difference, he would definitely favor concrete. He asked why the <br />county didn't put concrete on Silver Lake Road. <br />Public Works Director Lee stated that they hadn't because it's not permanent, and they are <br />planning to do something else with Silver Lake Road in the near future so that's why they used <br />bituminous. <br />Council Member Thomas stated she felt the question regarding concrete curb and gutter versus <br />bituminous was important to be asked of the citizens in each separate project. <br />Mayor Marty stated from here on out, they better put that question back in at the neighborhood <br />meetings every year. <br />Council Member Flaherty stated that what he is hearing is that the curb and gutter are virtually <br />secondary, and that he is hearing that they don't want them touching their streets this year. He • <br />stated they need to take a look at the future on what they are doing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.