My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2005/04/25
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Minutes - 2005/04/25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2025 4:15:46 PM
Creation date
3/5/2025 4:15:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
4/25/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Regular. Meeting <br />Apri125, 2005 <br />Mounds View City Hall <br />2401 Highway 10, Mounds View, MN 55112 <br />8:30 P.M. <br />1. MEETING IS CALLED TO ORDER <br />2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE <br />3. ROLL CALL: Many, Gunn, Flaherty, and Thomas <br />NOT PRESENT: Stigney <br />4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA <br />A. Monday, Apri125, 2005 City Council Agenda. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Thomas/Flaherty. To Approve the Monday, April 25, 2005 agenda as <br />presented. <br />Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />5. PUBLIC INPUT <br />Brian Amundsen, 3048 Woodale Drive, referenced the proposed 2005 Street Projects stating that <br />the project plans were flawed and the communication regarding the projects was poor. He <br />expressed concerns that the broken processes and communications has now broken the <br />community's trust because they did not comply with the City's Charter. He referenced <br />Ordinance 723 stating that the ordinance is a result of policies adopted by City Council, which in <br />turn provided Staff with the approval to prepare the Ordinances 654 and 723 from the Street <br />Committee Policy. He stated that the intent of the ordinances was supposed to foster community <br />involvement and protect the wetlands throughout the City. He called for the streets to meet <br />current design standards stating that the 2003 and 2005 Street Projects did not follow the first <br />step of the ordinance by presenting the cost of design and current costs prior to being approved. <br />He stated that for the sake of both staff direction and fiduciary responsibility, the City Council <br />should have directed Staff to present costs of the design prior to approving the project. He stated <br />that the Council did not ask for any input from the Community nor was any direction given to <br />Staff. He stated that the feasibility report exceeded the costs noting that the maximum allocation <br />• allowed is $14.50 per foot. He stated that the cost total should have been $869.00 not $3,000.00. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.