My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2005/04/25
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Minutes - 2005/04/25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2025 4:15:46 PM
Creation date
3/5/2025 4:15:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
4/25/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council April 25, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 9 <br />• options and what is available to them as recourse. She stated that now they know that the <br />Council has heard their concerns. <br />Council Member Thomas assured the residents that Council is listening to them. She explained <br />that by approving this household they would be dealing with a higher threshold and would have <br />some authority to enforce the permit requirements. She stated that the criteria would be outlined <br />in the approved resolution. <br />Council Member Flaherty agreed with Council member Thomas and clarified that neither party is <br />asking that the government step in to resolve. He noted that they are asking for the additiona160- <br />days in order to allow the dogs to acclimate and prove that the dogs would be fine in their new <br />environment. <br />Mr. Klosman stated that delays are foolish, as permits can be pulled any time. He stated that the <br />outlined standards would hold them to a higher standard. He stated that if there are any problems <br />they would surface quickly, as will the solutions. He suggested going for the higher standard, put <br />some teeth to the criteria and resolve it tonight. <br />City Attorney Riggs explained that the City Council and the Residents do have options under <br />Chapter 601 and Chapter 701 of the City Code. He confirmed that it is true that a conditional use <br />permit would hold the property owner to a higher standard. He stated that they could also insert <br />additional details that are law abiding. He stated that the resolution does specifically speak to the <br />• conditions that would have to be satisfied. <br />MOTION/SECOND. Gunn/Thomas. To Approve Resolution number 6507 with amendments <br />stating that any usage of the properly, as it relates to dogs, will abide by all local, county and state <br />laws. <br />Ayes-4 Nays-0 Motion carried. <br />B. 7:10 p.m. Public Hearing to Consider a Conditional Use Permit for an <br />Oversized Garage at 7965 Fairchild Avenue <br />Ms. Prososki stated that Rebecca and Brian are requesting a conditional use permit for an <br />oversized garage at 7965 Fairchild Avenue. She reviewed the setback requirements with Council <br />noting that they must be five feet from the property line and twelve feet from the rear. She stated <br />that the conditional use permit satisfies all code requirements. She stated that initially the <br />neighbors were concerned that the garage would be used as a place of business noting that the <br />intent is for additional storage. She stated that the Planning Commission has held the public <br />hearing and taken testimony from the residents and is recommending approval of the request. <br />Mayor Marty opened the public hearing at 9:42 p.m. <br />• Mayor Marty closed the public hearing at 9:43 p.m. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.