Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council May 23, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 23 <br />11. REPORTS <br />A. Reports of Mayor and Council <br />Council Member Flaherty suggested that the Council discuss the necessity of an English class for <br />the minutes, especially when reviewing punctuation. He stated that he would like to discuss if <br />this is necessary or should they review only for content. <br />Mayor Marty stated that in the past if Council Members had more than two corrections they <br />wrote them down and turned them into the Recording Secretary to be incorporated into the <br />minutes. <br />Council Member Stigney stated that he has a problem with this option because the City Council <br />would not have reviewed the changes prior to approving the minutes. <br />B. Staff <br />1. Public Works Quarterly Report <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that Public Works Director Lee was not available for the <br />meeting this evening and suggested rescheduling or provide comments to take back to the <br />Director. <br />• Mayor Marty had the following requests for update or clarification: <br />• City Hall rehab project. He referenced the last line noting that it states construction would <br />begin near the end of September or early October. He stated that it seems like a long way off <br />and he would like to get some of the issues, especially the mold issues, resolved. He <br />expressed concerns noting that City Employees have been breathing this stuff for years. He <br />noted that this is one of the reasons why the Finance Director is leaving is due to the poor air <br />quality in the building. He stated that he would like to make a pledge that this is addressed as <br />soon as possible. <br />• Trunk highway noise wall noting that the current Transportation status shows the project is <br />being termed as Phase 1 with an anticipated completion in 2007 and Phase 2, Interchange <br />improvements, with an anticipated completion in 2011. He stated that in Phase 2, MnDOT <br />anticipates the addition of a third lane on eastbound Highway 10. He stated that Staff is <br />recommending discussion on these items in late summer. He clarified that if MnDOT has <br />this in their plans to add another lane wouldn't the costs be on MnDOT with no cost to the <br />City. He stated that he would like to hold off on this to see what MnDOT does first. <br />• Silver Lake Road Sidewalk Project noting that based on the preliminary data, the bottom line <br />is that Staff anticipates a Spring 2006 construction for this project, if it should proceed. He <br />stated that Ramsey County has some problems with the setbacks on the side of the road <br />because the do not want a sidewalk up against the curb. He stated that they do want to <br />continue to keep pushing this forward. <br />• Referenced the third paragraph from the bottom, the holding pond at Woodcrest Park, and <br />• asked why the City did not receive the credits when they took the park down and created the <br />