My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2005/06/20
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Minutes - 2005/06/20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2025 4:17:56 PM
Creation date
3/5/2025 4:17:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
6/20/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council June 20, 2005 <br />Special Meeting Page 10 <br />• Mounds View and she did not believe that facility added to the economic benefit of Mounds <br />View. She asked if there would be any animal research at this facility. She stated Medtronic had <br />been given the world in Fridley and knew first hand that when they got the Fridley facility that <br />they "ran over" the citizens who had no say in the process, including her parents who lost their <br />home to the Medtronic World Headquarters building. <br />Aaron Backman, Economic Development Coordinator, stated he understood that 50 percent of <br />the Medtronic employees ate out of the facility. <br />John Dietrich, RLK, stated in terms of the traffic on Xylite, there would be a traffic signal <br />proposed on Coral Sea and County Road J as well as improvement from Naples. He stated the <br />traffic increase while it would be coming would be managed. <br />Rodger McCombs of Medtronic stated there would be no animal research at the facility. <br />Michael Hemenway, 8389 Pleasantview Drive, stated he grew up in this community and moved <br />back to the City. He indicated he was partial to big business and he supported this proposal. He <br />noted there was not much to do in Mounds View and it would be nice to have some respect be <br />brought back to the City again. He stated he would be happy if his property taxes did not go up. <br />He acknowledged this would be a difficult choice. <br />Lisa Rolfs, 8429 Eastwood Road, stated she has never worked in the City, but they chose to stay <br />in Mounds View due to the quality of life. She stated the Medtronic opportunity was a once in a <br />lifetime opportunity. She stated there were a lot of good things about the proposal that made it <br />attractive such as the trail proposal, the green space on the site, and the benefits to the schools. <br />She stated generally she was for it, but she was not necessary for this "deal". She felt the City <br />was being out negotiated by Medtronic and did not want the City to give out too much. She <br />expressed concern that they were at the top level of the TIF financing right away and that the <br />traffic and noise issues had not been addressed. She noted they needed to have a concrete plan in <br />place with much more information concerning the traffic as well as the increased need for public <br />service officers, etc. She stated the City needed to think big and any proposal should remove all <br />of the billboards. She asked the Council/EDA to determine what they wanted Mounds View to <br />be. She noted this was a large, attractive site, and ideally situated. She stated the City should not <br />underestimate the value of this. She asked the City go back to the table and renegotiate. <br />Valerie Amundsen, 3048 Woodale Drive, stated she had done some research and Mounds View <br />was one of the highest taxed cities in the entire metropolitan area. She stated Medtronic had <br />grown their revenue from 6.4 billion to ten billion, which is a large increase. She stated <br />Medtronic's taxes have grown 83 percent to 1.8 billion. She noted their income was growing <br />faster than their revenue. She asked at what cost was the company growing and asked if they <br />were taking advantage of Mounds View. She stated she did not want to be taken advantage of. <br />She noted she was a stockholder in the City and she cared about the bottom line and the future <br />and she wanted to see the City's leaders do what was right. She noted she had not seen any <br />• evidence that this was the best thing for the City. She asked the City to explore what was best for <br />the City and the land. She stated this was a great deal for Medtronic, but was it the best for the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.