Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council June Z0, 2005 <br />Special Meeting Page 5 <br />Brian Kaden, 7675 Spring Lake Road, stated he has lived in the City for 32 years and he liked the <br />idea of Medtronic coming into the City, but he did not like Medtronic coming into the City at the <br />cost of the taxpayers and he did not like to subsidize businesses. He stated Mounds View had the <br />fourth highest TIF in the state. He asked if he would get a tax break if he put an addition on his <br />house through TIF financing. He stated the taxpayers were helping the businesses pay their <br />mortgage and that was one of the reasons he believed this was not a good deal. He stated the TIF <br />financing was put into place to develop land that was not desirable and this practice was being <br />abused. He questioned how much of a benefit Medtronic would have in the City being located in <br />the northeast portion of the City. He believed Shoreview and Blaine businesses were going to <br />benefit more than the Mounds View businesses because of the location. He stated Medtronic <br />was amulti-billion dollar company and if they were a good corporate neighbor, why were they <br />asking for a tax break that the citizens did not get. He asked why Medtronic was not paying the <br />same taxes as Walgreens. He stated this would be a good project if Medtronic was not requiring <br />TIF financing. He suggested the City look at their TIF financing programs in the future. <br />Lloyd Bardwell, 2932 County Road J, stated County Road J was a public drag strip. He agreed <br />that Medtronic was a good corporation, but he also agreed Medtronic should not be given TIF <br />financing. He expressed concern about the increase in traffic on County Road J and he hated <br />living in his home because of the traffic. He stated there was no enforcement along that road and <br />the infrastructure was missing to go east and west on the road. He stated he was for the <br />development, but he did not believe Medtronic was paying their fair share of taxes. He stated he <br />was not complaining about his taxes, but the City needed to do something about the speeding <br />traffic. <br />Peter Martin, 2192 Oakwood Drive, stated he has been playing The Bridges Golf Course since <br />day one. He indicated dollars are fine and the large companies are going to get the money no <br />matter what they did, but what about the land and its value to the community and the values like <br />families being able to play golf together, health and fitness values, natural and wildlife values, <br />and moral values. He noted moral values are what the citizens need most and were harder to <br />come buy. He stated golf was based on honesty, integrity, and patience and these were values <br />needed by the children today because they were not taught in the school system anymore. <br />Barbara Haake, 3024 County Road I, stated she has lived in the City for 39 years. She indicated <br />Medtronic was a good company and she was neither for nor against this project, but she needed <br />more information. She thanked the Community Development Director for preparing the options <br />she had requested at a previous meeting. She noted Fridley had an appraisal done of $137.00 per <br />square foot and through mediation it went down to $109.00 and the $80.00 per square foot was <br />not a fair price. She stated Twin Lakes Development in Roseville was going for $300,000 per <br />acre .and Medtronic negotiated $120,000 per acre. She stated they were getting an appraiser price <br />as it was not as it was built out and she believed Medtronic should pay more. She stated <br />Medtronic should have to pay $235,000 to $260,000 per acre. She noted Medtronic had 4 billion <br />in cash and asked why the City was doing to subsidies for a company who had this type of <br />money. Community Development Director Ericson replied with regard to the Twin Lakes <br />• Development there were a lot of improvements made to the land in order for it to be sold and <br />