Minutes - 2005/07/11 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View City Council July 11, 2005 Regular Meeting Page 14 • when the City put the police officer positions out to referendum it was because it would have been a significant tax increase that would have been born financially by the residents of this City m a s~gmficant one-year tax increase that would continue on. She further clarified that rt wasn't that they were voting on two police officers it was a voting on paying the two police officers, which. is a big difference. She referenced the trading of public land and asked if the Council recalled the land swap for Walgreen's and asked if the City did a referendum because the City took public property and gave it to a private business and traded over. She clarified that the City owns property and is expected to manage property the City does not go to referendum to manage property, not even to a sale. She acknowledged that this huge and is probably the largest issue the Council will face, whether it rises to the issue of a referendum is for the people to decide. She stated that she is very happy to see so many people involved and this active in a City issue. She noted that this is the most activity she has seen in years and is excited to see Mounds View residents so active. She stated that if it does go to a referendum, that is a separate issue to address at that time. She stated that she believes she is fully capable`of making a decision based on property evaluations noting that she believes the City is probably getting the best deal the City could get. She is confident in this and stands by her decision. Council Member Gunn stated that she spent most of her day sitting at the computer reading emails and reviewing her notes from the Town Hall meetings. She stated that she has also spent a lot of her spare time and lunch breaks discussing Cite politics with residents. She stated that based on her emails and the responses from residents at the Town Hall meeting she found that approximately 90-percent of the residents are in favor of this project. She stated that she has to • listen to the people adding that she also feels that she has made the right decision for the City of Mounds View. Council Member Stigney stated that he keeps hearing a comparison that should be better and worth more. He explained that the appraisal of the land is for land located in Mounds View, not Blaine, Lino Lakes or Roseville. He stated that his only concern is with the appraisals they received for land located in Mounds View adding that fair appraisals were given, the City has done a negotiation with Medtronic and he believes the City has come up with a good deal for the City of Mounds View. He asked what the golf course has done for the City and answered nothing, until 2014, maybe, if the City is lucky. He stated that he does not believe that the golf course would bring in big dollars noting that the City would receive $4.6 to $S million that would come into the City immediately, yet no one mentions this. He stated that the City could utilize the money to help lower taxes and asked how the residents could just throw this out the window to go with a golf course that is losing money. He noted that it is also capped at $14.8 million adding that as the years go by the $14.8 million by today's dollars would be a lot less every year because they are capped at that value. He stated that Medtronic is the one taking the beating for the cap adding that Medtronic is also providing $8.65 for the park fund and $1 million for MnDOT. He stated that it is mind-boggling to keep hearing the spin and asked why they would keep a golf course that is losing money over Medtronic. He stated that if anyone could show him how the golf course would actually make money he would be willing to sign the petition. Council Member Flaherty noted that when this deal originally came to the table it was nowhere close to what it is today. He assured the residents that the Council has worked very hard on this