My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2005/07/11
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Minutes - 2005/07/11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2025 4:18:26 PM
Creation date
3/5/2025 4:18:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
7/11/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council 3uly 11, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 16 <br />somewhere south of Highway 10. He stated that the billboard contract on each billboard doesn't <br />• start until the billboard is placed, which means the contracts could run well beyond the thirty <br />years. <br />MOTION/SECOND. StigneylGunn To Approve the Second Reading and the Adoption of <br />Ordinance 760 Authorizing the Sale of Land Comprising The Bridges of Mounds View Golf <br />Course to the Mounds View Economic Development Authority and waive the reading. <br />City Administrator Ulrich called a roll call vote as follows: <br />Mayor Marty -Nay <br />Council Member Stigney -Aye <br />Council Member Gunn -Aye <br />Council Member Flaherty -Aye <br />Council Member Thomas -Aye <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that the motion passes 4 to 1. <br />Ayes-4 (Stigney, Gunn, Flaherty, Thomas) Nays-1 (Marry) Motion carried. <br />C. Resolution 6540, Approving a Comprehensive Land Use Amendment for The <br />Bridges of Mounds View Golf Course Site. <br />Director Ericson stated that this is something that originated back in 2003 when the City rezoned <br />the property from public facilities designation to industrial. He explained that Minnesota Statues <br />indicate that the Comprehensive Plan and zoning should be consistent with each other noting that <br />earlier this year, in January, the City Council directed the Planning Commission to review the <br />designation of the golf course and come up with an amendment that would be appropriate given <br />the zoning of the property and the possible future reuse of the property. He stated that in <br />February 2004 the Planning Commission adopted a resolution, which would recommend the <br />office designation as the appropriate land use. He stated that subsequent to the Planning <br />Commission recommendation the amendment was forwarded to the Metropolitan Council, who <br />took significant time to review the amendment and found issues associated with other agencies <br />including transportation issues. He noted that at the same time the City was going through the <br />AUAR process on the same land, so they were looked at in the same light in terms the potential <br />impacts. He stated that on April 27~' the Metropolitan Council did recommend and approve the <br />Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Amendment to office. He stated that the City held a <br />public hearing on May 23, 2004 and there is a resolution before Council that would effectuate the <br />change from outdoor sport/recreation and passive outdoor to office. He stated that this is <br />something that could be acted on regardless of what happens with the Medtronic project and is <br />something that is necessary based on the fact that the City rezoned the property in 2003. He <br />acknowledged that there are some ties to the previous item adding that this something that has to <br />occur regardless for statutory compliance. <br />'~ ~ Duane McCarty, 8060 Long Lake Road, stated that he is so glad that the Council wrote into the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.