My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2005/07/11
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Minutes - 2005/07/11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2025 4:18:26 PM
Creation date
3/5/2025 4:18:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
7/11/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council July 11, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br />a public property shouldn't the public have a say in what happens to it. She asked the Council if <br />• they could let the residents of this CitS~ help them make a decision that is going to impact the City <br />for generations to come. <br />Council Member Stigney acknowledged that they have a very different opinion to what <br />Medtronic brings to the City versus the golf course adding that is all he has to say. <br />Mayor Marty stated that he does not see Ms. Mueller's statement as an attack. He stated that she <br />was just clarifying her understanding of the City's vision and value statement. <br />Council Member Thomas stated that she does not consider it an attack adding that when someone <br />suggests that the Council set aside their integrity and ethics when the project began, this is not <br />the most positive statement to make. She assured Ms. Mueller that no one ever set aside their <br />values or integrity adding that the Council discussed all of this and their publication throughout <br />the entire process. She assured her that this was always number one. <br />Ms. Mueller clarified that if a private interest were to approach the City with a proposal to <br />purchase the Community Center and property for their development, has the City set a precedent <br />where the City can do again whatever they choose, within this body of our City Council, and the <br />same thing could happen again. She asked what would happen. if a developer wanted to purchase <br />Silver Lake Park, could the City sell this public property as well. <br />• Council Member Thomas explained that the City did not set a precedent. This is how a City <br />functions everywhere. She explained that the Council does not consider an enterprise function in <br />the same way that they view the parks. She stated that it involves an entirely different thought <br />process and function. She assured Ms. Mueller that the Council did not establish any precedent <br />that wasn't already established. She stated that the park analogy doesn't work for anyone up here <br />at this point. <br />Ms. Mueller stated that she does not have the benefit of everything involved, but as a resident of <br />the City, what we consider public properly, she assumed was owned by the City, and it is her <br />hope that this is not setting a trend. <br />Duane McCarty, 8060 Long Lake Road, stated that his old Irish Grandfather used to talk to him <br />about common sense and statements that he makes noting that he tries to adhere to his advice <br />whenever he can. He stated that it appears to him that common sense seems to be lacking when <br />he hears that Council didn't put it out for bid because they didn't own the land yet it certainly <br />didn't stop them from chasing Medtronic around the block. <br />6. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS <br />A. Review Fire Department Building Plans -Fire Chief Zikmund. <br />Fire Chief Zikmund explained that the purpose for the presentation this evening is to receive <br />. feedback from the Council noting that next Monday he would be presenting to the Spring Lake <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.