Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council August 8, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 15 <br />• interpretation of where they were putting the funds. She stated that they have more than enough <br />of the funding issues available to cover it and could leave it in the TIF funds if they wanted to <br />and at this point this would be a good direction for Staff if paying this is a legitimate concern. <br />City Administrator Ulrich explained that it had become an accounting problem with respect to <br />the time spent over the last couple of years. <br />Mayor Marty confirmed noting that the more they could transfer under that, as it was pointed out <br />to them earlier, that with the amount in the TIF pool, if this keeps building the City might have to <br />start paying some out. <br />Council Member Thomas stated that this is not enough of a concern to her to justify moving that <br />to the General Fund. She stated that she believes these are legitimate expenses in the TIF <br />District, which is why they have administrative fees with TIF .Districts. She stated that she <br />believes it is entirely appropriate to leave those personnel costs, for the moment, within the TIF <br />funds. <br />Mayor Marty explained that when he spoke with Mr. Hansen about the funds, one of his concerns <br />was with the accountability in reporting, which is where this probably came from. <br />Council Member Gunn explained that her concern with this is that as they go through <br />decertifying the TIF Districts, the City does not get hit all of a sudden with three salaries that <br />• would have to come completely out of the General Fund. She suggested gradually working <br />through this little by little so that the City is not hit with the entire amount all at once. <br />Mayor Marty acknowledged her concerns and suggested discussing this issue as part of next <br />year's budget discussion. He noted that the Council has a special work session scheduled for <br />next Monday at 7:00 p.m. to specifically discuss these issues. <br />C. Resolution 6585 Approving a Severance Package for Regular Full-time Golf <br />Course Employees. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that this item was discussed at the City Council Special Work <br />Session on July 5, 2005 and at that time it was the consensus of the Council to allow the normal <br />vacation, sick leave payouts in accordance with City policy and to allow accumulated flex time to <br />be paid out, over time, to each of the golf course employees impacted. He stated that currently <br />there are three fulltime, permanent employees at the golf course. He explained that flex time was <br />the vehicle used to account for the overtime hours the employees work during the summer that <br />are carried over into the winter. He explained that the employees normally work extra hours <br />during the summer and are paid, via flextime, during the winter months in order to remain on the <br />payroll as full-time, year-round employees. He stated that currently the City does not have any <br />special severance pay provisions for economic layoff noting that the last time this was discussed <br />he had proposed cone-week, per year of service severance provision and the Council, at the time, <br />• wanted more time to consider the proposal. He stated that the Resolution, as presented, outlines <br />the severance package and consists of the normal severance provisions of sick leave and vacation <br />