My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2005/08/08
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Minutes - 2005/08/08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2025 4:19:03 PM
Creation date
3/5/2025 4:19:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
8/8/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council August 8, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 23 <br />Ayes-5 Nays-0 Motion carried. <br />G. Resolution 6589 Approving a Minor Subdivision of 2812 Sherwood Road and <br />8084 Fairchild Avenue. <br />Director Ericson stated that the property owners of 8084 Fairchild Avenue are requesting the <br />approval of a minor subdivision noting that it would include the back one-third of the properly <br />located at 2812 Sherwood, which is adjacent to the Fairchild property. He explained that <br />currently there are two lots involved in this subdivision and it would create a third lot and the <br />third lot would be fronting Fairchild Avenue. He stated that all of the properties involved are <br />zoned R-1 Single-Family residential and they are designated low-density residential on the City's <br />Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map. He stated that the minor subdivision would be <br />consistent with the subdivision regulations, zoning regulations and all other requirements of the <br />City of Mounds View. He stated that this request has been reviewed by the Planning <br />Commission noting that couple of the issues discussed included Park Dedication requirements <br />noting that they did some research on in previous minor subdivisions of land prior to the City <br />code changes. He stated that they had previously accessed a 5-percent valuation on the park <br />dedication and that is now open-ended and up to the Council's discretion to determine what <br />would be an appropriate designation for a subdivision. He stated that if they utilize the 5-percent <br />park dedication fee for this property based on the per square foot value for the lot to be created it <br />would be a fee of $2,835.00, which is substantially more than previous minor subdivision park <br />dedication fees. He explained that it does reflect the fact that as the years progress land values <br />• are increasing and there is evidence that Ramsey County is catching up on property values as <br />well. He noted that they are not looking at a dollar per square foot as they have seen in the past <br />adding that it is closer to $4.00 per foot, which is why they have a larger park dedication fee. He <br />stated that originally they had indicated that it could be as high as $5,000.00 based on the 10- <br />percent valuation adding that there has to be some reasonable relationship between the <br />subdivision and the intensification of the land use. He stated that with the park dedication fee <br />Staff felt that a recommendation fora 5-percent park dedication fee would be appropriate for this <br />case and is included in the resolution. <br />Director Ericson stated that easements would be dedicated associated with this subdivision and <br />reviewed with Council. He stated that there is an easement that runs through the property and is <br />identified as Tract B noting that it would be the larger of the two properties located on Fairchild <br />Avenue. He stated that there would be a five foot easement towards the back of the property that <br />would have to be vacated and would be done by ordinance subsequent to Council's action this <br />evening. He stated that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the request and there <br />is some research on park dedication fees that goes back to the year 2000 that should be helpful in <br />making a decision about this subdivision. He stated that Staff is recommending approval noting <br />that a house would remain on the property and would be close to the lot line. He explained that <br />they intend to eventually remove the house and replace it with two new homes but would like to <br />keep the house located on the property so that they can maintain services on the property. He <br />stated that the Planning Commission felt that it was reasonable to grant them cone-year <br />. extension in demolishing the home until the first new home is constructed. He stated that it is a <br />minor subdivision and does not require a public hearing but they did send notices to the property <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.