Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council August S, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br />• intention of purchasing the 72-acres with the thought of land trading or profit by selling. He <br />stated that at the same time the contract gives Medtronic a free hand to the extent that they can, <br />under certain conditions, sell the property. He stated that he knows that there are provisals that <br />the EDA would be involved in adding that there are also provisals that the EDA cannot unfairly <br />or unnecessarily withhold the approval of the sale of the property and under at least two of the <br />conditions Medtronic could sell the property. He suggested that if subdivision and sale is going <br />to be allowed the City should break it up and convey the land by section/subdivision. He stated <br />that if Phase 1 comes to be, that is fine, but Phase 2 would require renegotiation because the City <br />would still own the land and the City would gain from the increase in value. <br />Mr. McCarty summarized stating that the job issue very clearly shows, by testimony from <br />Medtronic, that the jobs in Phase 1 would come from two facilities in Shoreview that would be <br />closed, two facilities in Arden Hills that would be closed, and the facility in Spring Lake Park. <br />He stated that Medtronic has stricken the exclusion verbiage in the contract that excludes existing <br />jobs from the job commitment of 1500, which simply means that Medtronic is not tied to this <br />number and they are now hearing that Phase 1 would not bring very many new jobs and nothing <br />is guaranteed beyond that for Phases 2 and 3. <br />Mr. McCarty concluded by stating that in presenting the amount of money that Medtronic <br />claimed they would bring to the City of Mounds View, they put in $46,000.00 for administration <br />costs noting that these are TIF related administrative costs and it does nothing for the General <br />• Fund. He noted that they are calculating their taxes a bit higher at $43,000.00 per year, but in the <br />face of this year's $S.I3 million dollar budget, the $43,000.00 doesn't impress him. He stated <br />that was does impress him is Medtronic's claim that their franchise fee would be $80,000.00 a <br />year to the City of Mounds View noting that as all of the Council knows the last Council he <br />served on tried to get rid of the hidden tax and bring it to floor so the residents would know what <br />they are getting. He stated that the last Council incorporated a provision in the last budget that <br />25-percent of this would be taken away and replaced with the property tax and over a period of <br />four years would be gone. He stated that he understands it is back to the original 4-percent and <br />expressed concerns about the future when future Councils see $80,000.00 a year in franchise fees <br />at the very start. He stated that the business community and residents should know this noting <br />that if the franchise fee is such a plum for the City then they should consider how long it would <br />lock the rest of us in for the same situation. He stated that they would never see the hidden tax <br />come into the light of day on the property taxes it should be. <br />David Jahnke, 8428 Eastwood Road, stated that he would like to comment on the last speaker <br />noting that he has never seen a tax that went away in the City of Mounds View. He stated that he <br />does not understand what all the comments were about adding that he is very disappointed that <br />nothing was mentioned about all the pluses the Medtronic project would bring to the City of <br />Mounds View. He stated- that only the negatives were mentioned, which he found very <br />disappointing. He indicated that a resident did come down and shared honest information with <br />the City noting that there should have been a mass mailing to the community that included the <br />true facts of this .project. He expressed concerns regarding the information that is being provided <br />• to the community noting that there has been considerable miscommunication from the start. He <br />expressed his doubts about signing the petition when the information on the petition is not clear <br />