Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council August 22, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 41 <br />Mayor Marty stated he does not want that line of discussion to continue. He stated that he knows <br />City Administrator Ulrich and his staff worked very hard on certifying the signatures and if one <br />person couldn't read it the signature was viewed by others and cross referenced through <br />addresses and utility billing. <br />Brian Amundsen, 3048 Woodale Drive, stated he supports a City wide referendum, whether <br />advisory or actual referendum, Primarily because it answers the question by the entire community <br />and is not on the backs of five people. The referendum will say if the City, all residents, really <br />favor this deal. He suggested that case Iaw is very specific to the case and cannot be applied <br />generally to any other case of other situations. Mr. Amundsen noted this came up with the <br />placement of the Ten Commandments; the cases appeared to be the same but came to two <br />different conclusions. <br />Mr. Amundsen asked whether, in fact, the ordinance has a legislative component since the <br />ordinance includes both the sale of property as well as approval of TIF Districts; establishment of <br />a taxing mechanism and taxing deferment, which was approved by legislative action by the <br />Legislature. He stated that sufficiency is a measure of the number of registered voters and clearly <br />there appears to not be a sufficient number. That is why there are additional steps allowed to <br />citizens in order to proceed. He stated that is how it should proceed, at this point, for the Clerk <br />Administrator to notify the Council and petition committee of the insufficiency and for the <br />committee to take action. He stated his opinion that the Council should take no action. He stated <br />• the Charter Commission is currently working on Chapter 5 to provide additional clarity. <br />Mr. McCarty stated assuming that the petition were to be valid and the Council agrees, there is an <br />opportunity to correct the deficiency. He agreed that no decision should be made on the number <br />of qualified voters that would bring this petition in as sufficient. Mr. McCarty stated that it <br />should be decided by all residents after full debate and the opportunity for Medtronic to put their <br />position forward. He stated he thinks as many voters will appear at the polls as appeared at the <br />Last general election. Mr. McCarty urged the Council to not "gut the Charter" and stated he can <br />accept stepping back to an advisory referendum to assure the details are worked out. <br />Jan Brink asked about the phone survey. Mayor Marty stated it was aCity-wide telephone <br />survey and 400 people were involved. He stated that she can get a copy of the survey if she'd <br />like. <br />Ms. Brink asked if the respondents were certified registered voters. <br />Councilmember Flaherty explained the survey was just one of the many tools that were used in <br />the Council's decision making process. Other tools included talking with Ehlers, discussion with <br />staff, and several meetings held to accept public input, which was the most important. <br />Ms. Brink stated she is concerned their opinion is more important to the Council than those who <br />• signed the petition. <br />