My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2005/10/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Minutes - 2005/10/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2025 4:20:52 PM
Creation date
3/5/2025 4:20:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
10/10/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council October 10, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 19 <br />• Mayor Marty inquired if the auctioneer had been informed this auction might not proceed as <br />scheduled. City Administrator Ulrich replied he had. <br />Councilmember Stigney stated as far as "being on the hook", they funded the golf course anyway <br />and to him he believed they were exclusive measures and whether Medtronic came in or not, he <br />believed they should get out of the golf course business, sell the land and be done with <br />everything. <br />Councilmember Thomas stated the timing was theirs to control and should this fall through and <br />they not have the Medtronic development, they had the opportunity to continue the golf course in <br />the Spring. She stated if they made this anon-revenue producing property, the bonds would be <br />due whether somebody else owned it or not. <br />Councilmember Stigney asked if they sell golf course equipment were the bonds due. City <br />Attorney Riggs responded if they discontinued the golf course business, the bonds would become <br />due and payable. <br />Councilmember Stigney asked if they still had income coming in from the billboards wouldn't <br />this pay the bond. City Attorney Riggs stated they needed to give the City Administrator the <br />option to reschedule the auction and allow further time for staff to research the bond issue. <br />• Councilmember Thomas stated the actual dollar amounts was not that important and the bonds <br />were set up as the financing mechanism for the golf course and while they could probably find <br />the money to continue the golf course, the bonds were tied to the financial mechamsm. <br />Councilmember Stigney asked how much was required for the next few years for bond payments <br />and requested the City Attorney to research this further. <br />Councilmember Flaherty stated he agreed that if the assets of the golf course were gone, the <br />bonds would be due. Mayor Marty also agreed. <br />Councilmember Stigney stated they should get out of the golf course business and they had other <br />money available in other funds to pay off the bonds which he believed they should do. <br />Ayes-1 Nays-1 (Councilmember Stigney) Motion carried. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Marty/Stigney. To postpone the Resolution until after the closing and <br />have this be brought back to the Council. <br />Councilmember Flaherty stated he did not believe this needed a motion. After further review, <br />Mayor Marty agreed. <br />Councilmember Stigney did not agree and believed they needed a motion. He indicated they <br />• needed to postpone this to a specific time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.