Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council October 10, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br />• to be regraded. He understood Mr. Hanson had done some of the work and they were working <br />with Mr. Hanson to resolve and correct the problems. <br />Mr. Rudy stated he had no problem with the staff, but rather with the owner of the property. He <br />stated the property owner was not being a good neighbor. He stated the property owner should <br />be made to put up a retaining wall. <br />Mayor Marty asked if there was any damage to the dwelling. Mr. Rudy replied it got up to the <br />foundation, but did not get into the home. <br />Mayor Marty requested staff check into this and report back to the Council. He asked if staff <br />could expedite this. Director Ericson stated staff would talk to Mr. Hanson and emphasis the fact <br />that something needed to be done and the silt fence properly installed. However, he noted this <br />could become a civil issue between the two property owners. He stated he understood Mr. <br />Jenkins' concerns. <br />Mayor Marry inquired about a Swale or retaining wall. Director Ericson stated this had been <br />discussed and they had decided to put a Swale between the property line with a small berm, but <br />he noted there was no vegetation on the property, so the Swale quickly filled in with silt and once <br />everything was done, he believed everything would function properly, but until that happened, <br />something needed to be done with the grading. He noted the Swale was not sufficient to handle a <br />large rain event and this needed to be regraded to something more significant. He stated staff <br />. would talk to Mr. Hanson tomorrow. Mr. Rudy requested staff inform him of the time of the <br />meeting so he could be there also. <br />Tom Belting, 122 Blackwood Street, Coon Rapids, expressed concern about the Groveland Park <br />Building bidding system. He stated he did not believe the specifications were accurate on the <br />bid. Mayor Marty stated Council had considered putting this out for rebid. <br />Dave Warwick, 5081 Edgewood Drive, expressed concern about the parking ban put into place a <br />few weeks ago. He presented a petition signed but all but two neighbors on the street. He stated <br />the parking ban was well intentioned to protect the children crossing the street, but as he saw it, <br />there were two problems. The first problem was the complete 24-hour a day parking ban. He <br />believed this type of a ban was too excessive. He stated there were 14 residences being <br />inconvenienced by this and some of the residents needed to park on the street. He stated when <br />the residents had guests, there would be nowhere them to park. He stated they could park in the <br />school parking lot, but who would be liable if someone was hurt. He indicated the Police Chief <br />assured him that if they contact the Police Department they could have permission to park in the <br />no parking area. He stated he believed this reduced their property values and inquired if there <br />was no parking, there would be cars waiting on both the west and east side of the street, which <br />would pose a greater safety problem for the children. He stated this would not solve the parking <br />problem and he recommended the parking ban be limited to the time the children were outside, <br />such as 7-9 a.m. and 2-4 p,m. He noted by doing it this way, parents who needed to take their <br />• kids out of school for some reason, needed a place to park where they could quickly go into the <br />school to retrieve their kids. He stated the second problem was that this got rushed through on <br />