My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2005/10/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Minutes - 2005/10/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2025 4:20:52 PM
Creation date
3/5/2025 4:20:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
10/10/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council October 10, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 9 <br />• Development. <br />Mayor Marty invited public comment. There were no public comments made. <br />Mayor Marty closed the public hearing at 7:50 p.m. <br />Councilmember Thomas thanked staff for looking into the easement issues on the outlots. <br />Mayor Marty asked if Ordinance 765 would be changed to state this. Director Ericson responded <br />he was not sure it was appropriate to be in the ordinance, but it would be in the preliminary plat. <br />He requested on Resolution 6630 the last sentence under Resolved S. be stricken. <br />Director Ericson requested changing the resolution to require phase 2 and phase 3 come back <br />before the Council. He indicated the intent was to get authorization for the full buildout, but if <br />Council only wanted to approve Phase 1 at this time, that was in their power to do that. <br />City Attorney Riggs stated the Council had broad discretion in this matter. He indicted the <br />development contract contemplates a phased development and if there were any deviations from <br />that, it would have to come back to Council. He stated he did not believe they were dealing with <br />the same issues. <br />• Director Ericson stated in his staff report he recommended if there were no changes made to the <br />development, Medtronic could move forward with it, but if changes were made, this needed to be <br />reviewed by the City Council. He noted they could add this to the Resolution. <br />Councilmember Flaherty believed this was a good idea and asked if something could be written <br />in the ordinance addressing this also. Community Development Director Ericson responded they <br />could do that also. <br />Mayor Marty stated he had a question on Resolution 6630, first page, item 3. He noted <br />subsequent changes would be dealt with by future Councils and he suggested they have <br />something in there that Council has a cursory review. He indicated he wanted to leave that <br />option open. <br />Councilmember Thomas stated she had no problem stating that Council should look at changes, <br />but reminded the Council that they were approving a three phase development and that was the <br />whole point of the plan and cautioned them to not go too far down the road. She stated they had <br />to draw the line at some point and every choice the Council made, a future Council needed to <br />deal with. She stated as long as the plans did not change, Medtronic should not be required to <br />come back to .Council. Director Ericson suggested striking under Resolution 6630, item 3 "with <br />the exception of updating the transportation mitigation plan". He also suggested adding after <br />approved plans "all applicable current codes and regulations." <br />• Mayor Marty asked if they could create a swale or berm to contain the water on the current hole 9 <br />so all water was maintained on their property. Public Works Director Lee responded that could <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.