Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council October 24, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br />• with BCBS as a separate entity. Staff checked with several metro communities including Anoka, <br />Lake Elmo, Lakedale, Oakdale, Plymouth, and Stillwater, all larger or comparable with Mounds <br />View. Anoka had the worst experience with the cooperative and didn't necessarily recommend it <br />.but felt it was a beneficial program. He stated Anoka was not sure rates were as competitive as <br />they could be each year. Another disadvantage is that it hooks the City into staying with them <br />and if you want to bid on a year-to-year basis you would have to leave the cooperative. If the <br />City stays and bids within the cooperative then the City can be booted out of the cooperative and <br />be required to seek coverage elsewhere. He advised the commitment, once you enter <br />cooperative, is to not leave and bid the process every year. <br />City Administrator Ulrich noted that if you look at the long run and series of years, like the last <br />six years, the co-op offers better long-term rates. He advised that due to the significant 2006 cost <br />savings of $18,846 for the same coverage, and positive feedback from other cities, staff <br />recommends the Council approve the draft resolution approving Service Cooperative (Appletree) <br />as the City's 2006 health care insurance provider. He noted the City will need to monitor rates <br />on an annual basis and be prepared to leave the co-op if rates appear to be non-competitive. He <br />advised that one of the items that came up in staff research is that the State audited cooperatives, <br />found some were not competitive because they represent a lot of rural communities, and BCBS <br />provides better coverage to rural communities compared to Health Partners. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated a number of urban communities have utilized a cooperative and <br />after research staff is confident it would be a good way for the City to go. <br />• Finance Director Beer stated one of the reasons the co-o is ve com etitive is because the <br />p rY p Y <br />consist of 20-25% of Blue Cross-Blue Shield's business and have clout in getting better rates. <br />Councilmember Thomas stated the report mentioned other cities had, in the past, problems <br />getting timely information and answers. She asked what is the City's recourse should that occur <br />and the City feel they are not getting proper service. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated one of the most important points is that the co-op is member <br />driven so it would behoove the City to get involved with the annual meetings as things move <br />along. As a member, the City has the right to file complaints, go to the Management Board, or <br />direct policy at the annual meetings. He pointed out that with a co-op, there is both opportunity <br />and responsibility to be sure it is properly managed. He noted the pattern of responsiveness was <br />from several years ago and has now improved. <br />Councilmember Flaherty pointed out that four of the five cities polled give high endorsements <br />with Lake Elmo being only on since October St". He commented that typically co-ops practice a <br />solid business plan, is a low cost provider, which may not mean the cheapest, but they do assure <br />clientele for future years, which helps with budgeting purposes. He stated this is a sound <br />business plan and they have consciously said this is what they want to follow. He .stated he has <br />no problem going with this co-op plan and would support staff s recommendation. <br />Finance Director Beer stated staff looked at where are we in regard to health care as far as usage. <br />