Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council November 14, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br />• Councilmember Thomas stated her opinion that it is not the intention to question the integrity of <br />the City Council and that would not have been allowed to happen. <br />Mr. Perrozzi stated the City withheld money and asked if they will use it to finish the parking lot. <br />He stated his attorney is recommending they take this matter into court. <br />Councilmember Flaherty stated when the plans originally came in, they were reviewed by the <br />City. He asked if they were reviewed with the surrounding businesses. Director Ericson stated <br />the elevations did extend into the surrounding properties when the City's engineers reviewed the <br />plans, it was with the ability to see the impact with the adjoining properly. <br />Councilmember Flaherty asked if they were impacted. Director Ericson stated it is difficult to <br />make a single statement on the impact because the plans were changing every other week. There <br />was an initial desire to tie the two properties together with a shared access and parking lot. But, <br />at some point, that did not work or the plans were changed so a curb cut was added to separate <br />the two properties and the drainage directed to the back of the lot with a series of catch basins <br />and draining into the pond. Because that project was not finished, the drainage went into Mr. <br />Perrozzi's back yard. The grading and drainage has now been changed and assured all of the <br />PAK drainage is being captured and directed toward the catch basin with no impact to Mr. <br />Perrozzi's property. <br />Mr. Perrozzi stated he talked to the Rice Creek Watershed District and they had the impression, <br />when they reviewed those plans, that Velmeir owned all of the property. He stated he has always <br />indicated that he is open to meeting and talking about the issues. <br />Councilmember Flaherty asked if the CVS building was to have on-site panding and if it was <br />encroaching on the PAK building. Director Ericson stated all the retention ponding is on the <br />CVS property with no impact to the PAK property. <br />Mr. Perrozzi again asked if he could have his engineers meet with the City's engineers to <br />determine how the plans got approved this way. Otherwise, he will turn it over to his attorney. <br />Councilmember Thomas asked if this meeting would help in any way or what would help solve <br />this problem. <br />Mayor Marty asked if Mr. Perrozzi should use his attorney. <br />Director Ericson stated the issue is that Mr. Perrozzi does not have his parking lot and Velmeir <br />has agreed to make certain improvements to the PAK property but that has not occurred. He <br />suggested that what has to happen is for Velmeir to come forward and make the improvements. <br />Mr. Perrozzi stated he had no problem with selling the property for development but not if it <br />compromised the PAK building. <br /> <br />