My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2005/11/28
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Minutes - 2005/11/28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2025 4:21:50 PM
Creation date
3/5/2025 4:21:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
11/28/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council November 28, 2005 <br />Regular Meeting Page 2 <br />requests for development have been submitted. The Council authorized a wetland delineation for <br />the area as to where it is and how it will impact possible or future development. Director Ericson <br />noted that some property owners in that area are interested in developing but nothing has been <br />formally presented. <br />Mr. Meyer asked what is the possible cost to Mounds View for removal of the billboards. <br />Director Ericson stated the potential exposure to the City if there is no home for an additional <br />billboard sign is $810,000 and the risk is for one sign. If one sign can be located elsewhere in <br />Mounds View, then there is no risk for any additional relocation costs. He advised that Clear <br />Channel is working on that process and has asked the City to not be involved until they have <br />presented options. <br />Mr. Meyer suggested that the best possible location with no cost to the City would be off Ardan <br />Park, which has the same exposure across the street and can hold two to three signs without any <br />trouble. However, if development is approved there first, it may be a problem. <br />Director Ericson explained that land is zoned single family residential and Mn/DOT and the <br />Federal Highway Beautification Act requires billboards to be located in commercial or <br />industrially zoned property. Therefore billboards cannot be located along the majority of <br />Highway 10 on the south side because it is zoned residential and not appropriate for a billboard. <br />• Mr. Meyer suggested rezoning some property. <br />6. SPECIAL ORDER OF BUISESS <br />None. <br />7. COUNCIL BUSINESS <br />A. 7:05 p.m.: Continued Public Hearing to Consider the Second Reading and <br />Adoption of Ordinance 766, An Ordinance Authorizing the Vacation of a <br />Drainage and Utility Easement Associated with the Belting Office <br />Development <br />Mayor Marty noted this public hearing was opened at the .last meeting and remains open tonight <br />for public input. <br />Community Development Director Ericson explained the public hearing remained open for <br />publication and notification purposes since it was not done as soon as it should have been. The <br />public hearing was continued to assure all had an opportunity to provide input. <br />Director Ericson advised that the request is for second reading of the ordinance to vacate an <br />• easement granted when Walgreens was constructed. He explained the storm water drainage <br />easement is located in the corner where Belting is proposing an 8,300 square foot office building. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.