My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packets - 2006/04/10
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Agenda Packets - 2006/04/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 12:54:57 PM
Creation date
3/6/2025 12:50:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Agenda Packets
MEETINGDATE
4/10/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />Mounds View City Council March 27, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page I I <br />quote of $9,500. <br />Mayor Marty stated the Council is approving which firm to take a look at the Community Center. <br />He stated if the Council approves Rozeboom tonight and the project goes farther, and they do not <br />agree to reduce their fees to 6 percent, DSGW could have been a little cheaper in the long run. <br />He stated both firms are relatively comparable, but is leaning towards DSGW even though they <br />did not come out to the Community Center. <br />Councilmember Thomas asked if there is an indication from past history if the firm stayed on <br />budget and timelines. City Administrator Ulrich stated Rozeboom satisfied the budget and <br />timelines on both the Andover and North St. Paul projects. He offered to research it further. <br />Valerie Amundsen, 3048 Woodale Drive, stated she and her husband belong to Anytime Fitness <br />in Mounds View. She stated the business is thriving, is a real asset to community and is also <br />reasonable priced. She stated she agrees that the City should not get into things like this as it <br />runs the risk of driving a brand new business out of the City. <br />MOTION/SECOND: THOMAS/GUNN. To waive the reading and adopt Resolution 6785 <br />Approving Execution of a Letter of Agreement for Community Center Remodeling Design <br />Services, with the amendment to select DSGW Architects. <br />Councilmember Stigney stated it will cost the City $5,000 to proceed with the project, when the <br />City should not be looking at proceeding with it at all. <br />Finance Director Beer suggested that the Council designate the fund that should be used to pay <br />the $5,000 fee as part of the resolution. He recommended the Special Projects Fund. <br />A consensus was reached that the Special Projects Fund should be used. <br />Ayes — 3 Nays — 1 (Stigney) Motion carried. <br />F. Consider Request of Mr. Brian Amundsen, 3048 Woodale Drive, Regarding <br />Enforcement of Building Code Provisions. <br />Director Ericson explained that Brian and Valerie Amundsen live at 3048 Woodale Drive and <br />have a swimming pool in their rear yard. He explained there is a six foot tall fence around their <br />backyard to comply with City Code, which requires (at least) a five foot tall fence for pool areas. <br />He stated that last year, the Amundsens' next door neighbor at 7092 Pleasant View Drive <br />constructed a low -height retaining wall alongside the Amundsens' fence and graded the land <br />level between the wall and garage. He explained the end result is that because of the change in <br />elevation along the common property line, the fence no longer offers the same level of security as <br />it did before the neighbor's lot was graded. Director Ericson stated the Amundsens charge that <br />due to the actions of the neighbor, their fence no longer conforms to City Code and they are <br />assuming undue and unnecessary risk and liability and are requesting Council action to correct <br />the situation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.