My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2009/01/26
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
Minutes - 2009/01/26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 1:08:46 PM
Creation date
3/6/2025 1:08:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
1/26/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council January 26, 2009 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br />needed soon to assure no there is no gap in coverage. He explained that if an experienced officer <br />was being considered, at a higher salary, the decision would be brought before the Council. <br />Council Member Gunn stated her support for the resolution considering the survey results <br />indicated a high priority on being safe and feeling safe in the community. She stated this was <br />solely to the thanks of the Police Department. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Gum~/Mueller. To Waive the Reading and Approve Resolution 7404, <br />Authorization to Create an Eligibility List to Fill a Police Officer Position. <br />Council Member Stigney stated he has no objection to creating the eligibility list but is concerned <br />about authorizing hiring at this time. He noted the Council does not yet know what will happen <br />with the budget and maybe the State will do something to help. <br />AMENDMENT MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Hull (for discussion purposes). To Waive <br />Reading and Approve Resolution 7404, Authorization to Create an Eligibility List to Fill a Police <br />Officer Position, as revised to remove the "Now Therefore be it Further Resolved" paragraph. <br />Council Member Mueller stated while she understands the concern, thinks there are other places <br />in the budget that can be cut besides Public Safety. She stated Police Chief Sommer runs a "lean <br />department" and is recommending this action. She supports doing so as quickly as possible and <br />noted the survey results indicated the importance of Public Safety. <br />Council Member Hull stated he would ordinarily agree with Council Member Stigney on staff <br />issues of this sort but in 2003 or 2004 residents raised the levy to hire two officers, showing they <br />are willing to pay more in taxes to have good police services. Also, when considering combining <br />police services with another community, residents were adamantly opposed to it. Because of <br />those two issues, he does not support the motion amendment. <br />Council Member Gunn agreed that residents spoke in the referendum that they want awell- <br />staffed police force to protect this community. She felt that with a rise in some crimes, it is <br />important for residents to have that comfort level, which is thanks to the Police Department. <br />Council Member Stigney clarified the amendment is not to make a cut in Public Services but to <br />create the eligibility list and, once completed, the Council can consider giving authorization to <br />hire or not hire. He felt giving that authorization at this time would tie the Council's "hands" <br />before it knows the budget situation. <br />Mayor Flaherty noted the survey clearly indicates that Public Safety is very important to the <br />community and is the most visible service provided to residents. Also, as Council Member Hull <br />indicated, citizens stepped forward and voted to pay for excellent police services. He agreed that <br />everything is on the table when considering the budget, and tonight the discussion is on Public <br />Safety. Mayor Flaherty stated his support for a seamless transition between the retiring officer <br />and new officer so he favored adoption of the resolution. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.