Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council January 26, 2009 <br />Regular Meeting Page 7 <br />Attorney Riggs stated the applicant did meet the Code; however, the Council has raised questions <br />and those answers can be considered at the next meeting. <br />Council Member Gunn stated she was surprised that a Blaine organization, not a local group, was <br />coming into Mounds View to run charitable gambling. <br />Council Member Stigney asked what level of contribution is required by surrounding <br />communities for their charitable gambling permits. Clerk-Administrator Ericson stated it varies <br />from city to city. Council Member Stigney suggested Mounds View review the charitable <br />gambling ordinance and whether it should require that Mounds View, not the trade area, receive <br />a percentage. <br />Council Member Gunn suggested the Council discuss this ordinance at a Work Session and <br />consider requiring a percentage donation to the City. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Stigney. To Postpone Consideration of Resolution 7405 to the <br />next Council meeting to allow staff to obtain answers to the Council's questions. <br />Mayor Flaherty stated the Blaine Jaycees is a reputable organization, complies with City Code, <br />paid the licensing fee, and has an agreement with Robert's so he sees no reason to postpone <br />consideration. He suggested the Council discuss the issue of donations at a Work Session. <br />Council Member Stigney stated the postponement is not to stop other entities but he believed the <br />Code should be clarified prior to this approval, which would be tied up for one year. <br />Mayor Flaherty felt the Council could move forward with this request and address it further at a <br />Work Session. He stated he is not against looking at what surrounding communities require but <br />does not think it is fair to the Blaine Jaycees or Robert's to postpone consideration. <br />Council Member Mueller stated she was not sure atwo-week postponement would be an issue <br />for Robert's, noting they have no charitable gambling until a license is approved and she does not <br />want to do harm to this business if it is a draw for their customers. However, she believed that <br />some valid questions were raised tonight. <br />Council Member Gunn agreed that valid questions were raised but she did not support <br />postponement or a moratorium consideration. Instead, these issues could be considered at the <br />next Work Session. <br />Council Member Mueller called the question. <br />Attorney Riggs advised that the Code was changed two years ago to allow for a trade area and <br />that can be revisited. Since the Code does not clearly state that there is a one year limit, he <br />• recommended setting a date certain for the term of this charitable gambling license. <br />Council Member Stigney withdrew his second to the postponement motion. Council Member <br />