My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2009/04/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
Minutes - 2009/04/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 1:11:25 PM
Creation date
3/6/2025 1:11:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
4/27/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council Apri127, 2009 <br />Regular Meeting Page 9 <br /> <br />Chair Thomas stated if the franchise fee is increased more than 5%, it would go to referendum. <br />Clerk-Administrator Ericson clarified that when there is a new franchise agreement, the City <br />remains bound by the limitation of the Charter to not increase by more than 5%. Currently the <br />limit is to not increase the franchise fee by more than 4%. <br />Council Member Stigney noted the Council is being asked to make this Charter amendment <br />without it going to a referendum. He stated he is philosophically against having a franchise fee <br />plus a levy going to the same tax payers. Rather, he thinks they should be wrapped into one. <br />Chair Thomas stated if the Council is against the franchise fee concept, it can make that <br />determination in 2012. <br />Finance Director Beer noted the Legislature is considering giving local tax authority to counties <br />and cities to have a sales tax and that would have to be via referendum. With regard to combining <br />the franchise fee and levy, he noted the levy is a set dollar amount but the franchise fee is a fixed <br />rate and variable depending on things like energy costs. Thus, the City could not stay within the <br />constraints of Section 7.03 if the two are combined. <br />Chair Thomas stated the levy is based on property tax, not on the use of energy or water, and that <br />is why service based fees or cost of services based fees are separated out. <br />Clerk-Administrator Ericson suggested this consideration be postponed to allow participation by <br />Council Member Gunn. In addition, five affirmative votes are required to adopt. <br />Council Member Stigney stated he looks at the aggregate amount of all fees within the 5% cap. <br />However, Council Member Gunn interpreted that it means each individual fee cannot increase by <br />5%. <br />Chair Thomas explained the consideration is each individual fee since each fee has its own <br />accounting method and requirements. He noted that it does not put specific limits on fees that are <br />cost based. However, it does put specific limits on a fee for a service where the cost of that service <br />does not change from year to year. All of the caps are percentage based. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Flaherty. To Postpone Consideration of Ordinance 819, an <br />Ordinance Amending Chapter 7, Section 7.03, of the City Charter Relating to Fees Subject to <br />Provisions of Section 7.03, Subdivisions 1 and 2. <br />Ayes - 4 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />8. CONSENT AGENDA <br />Mayor Flaherty asked to remove Item B. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.