Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council June 22, 2009 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br /> <br />K. Resolution 7467, Approving New and Replacement Signage at the Mounds <br />View Community Center for Creative Kids Academy. <br />Community Development Director Roberts presented the request of Creative Kids Academy to <br />change and add signage for their facility in the Mounds View Community Center, which requires <br />a Zoning Permit. Because the business is located at the Community Center, Council approval is <br />required. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Hull. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 7467, <br />Approval of a Zoning Permit for New and Replacement Signage for Creative Kids Academy, a <br />Tenant in the Mounds View Community Center. <br />Council Member Stigney asked whether the applicant wants to retain its ground sign and add two <br />additional signs. Community Development Director Roberts clarified the applicant now has two <br />locations of signage, one a ground sign that will be replaced and the taller sign listing all tenants <br />will not change. The additional sign would be on the upper part of the wall of the building, west <br />side of the Community Center. <br />The Council discussed its concern with proliferation of ground signs and the amount of signage <br />allowed in a multi-tenant building. Discussion also ensued regarding whether the resolution <br />. should put the tenant on notice that ground signs may not be allowed in future leases. <br />Community Development Director Roberts stated the City owns this building so it could indicate <br />the ground sign has to be removed at a future date, or that a shared ground sign may be an option. <br />Council Member Stigney expressed concern that this may "open the door" too far with regard to <br />ground signage. Attorney Riggs restated that the City owns the property and is able to indicate, if <br />desired, that the ground sign will be removed through the lease renewal process. Council <br />Member Stigney stated if he were to lease this property he would want to know up front it is a <br />possibility that the sign may not be allowed in the future. <br />Clerk-Administrator Ericson stated this sign has been in place for six to seven years but that the <br />City could consider new language about signs when a new lease is negotiated. <br />AMENDMENT MOTION/SECOND: Stigney/Gunn. To amend the motion to add Condition 2: <br />Continuation of the signage is subject to the existing lease language and future lease negotiations. <br />Council Member Gunn asked if the purpose is to control new ground signage or the removal of <br />existing ground signs. Council Member Stigney stated he thinks the City should be in control of <br />both. Council Member Gunn stated she supports controlling new signage requests, but not <br />existing signs since the City has already approved them. <br />The Council reviewed the language of the lease agreement, Section 3.1, Tenant Use, which <br />indicates the tenant may, at its sole expense, install signage on and around the building. It also <br />