My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2009/07/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
Minutes - 2009/07/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 1:13:31 PM
Creation date
3/6/2025 1:13:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
7/27/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council July 27.2009 <br />Regular Meeting Page 4 <br />i of the Zoning Code to Remove the Word "decks" from Allowed <br />Encroachments. <br />Community Development Director Roberts presented the ordinance amendment, noting it is of a <br />housekeeping nature. <br />MOTION/SECOND: Gunn/Stigney. To Waive the Reading and Approve First Reading of <br />Ordinance 827, Amending Chapter 1104 of the Mounds View Zoning Code to Remove "Decks" <br />from Allowed Encroachments. <br />Council Member Mueller asked if existing decks in a setback are grandfathered. Community <br />Development Director Roberts answered in the affirmative. <br />Ayes - 5 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br />2. First Reading of Ordinance 828, Revising Chapter 1106.03, Subd. lb <br />of the Zoning Code to Clarify Language in Regard to Accessory <br />Building Height. <br />Community Development Director Roberts presented the amendment and explained how the <br />accessory building height is measured. He noted that larger motor homes require a larger sized <br />door and this amendment will allow the construction to meet that need. <br />Council Member Mueller referenced Section 3, Item b, and suggested the following be removed: <br />"whichever is less." She felt it was too restrictive and presented a scenario where the owner of a <br />one-story home would be limited in the size of accessory structure when compared to a property <br />with atwo-story house. <br />Council Member Gunn stated a while ago atwo-story accessory garage was constructed and the <br />concern is that the accessory building not be taller than the primary structure. <br />Council Member Mueller stated if every other property has a 15 or 20 foot tall accessory <br />building, why should the one-story homeowner be restricted from the same benefit. Community <br />Development Director Roberts stated it is a policy decision of the Council in how the City should <br />look. He explained the height limitation would be to the peak of the roof. <br />Clerk-Administrator Ericson noted that another part of the Zoning Code regulates the lot <br />coverage for an accessory building based on the size of the lot, which ensures the building <br />footprint is appropriate to the lot. He noted that the appearance of a two-story garage next to a <br />14-foot high rambler may not be aesthetically pleasing to some people. <br />The Council discussed the option to request a variance, which requires showing a hardship. <br />• Community Development Director Roberts advised the Planning Commission recommended a <br />maximum height of 20 feet to ensure it would accommodate a larger sized motor home. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.