Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council November 9, 2009 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br /> <br />Assistant Clerk-Administrator Crane presented the recommendation of the City Attorney to pay <br />Kenneth Koss, who had resigned effective October 26, 2009, for vacation time payout totaling <br />$414.41 and compensatory time payout totaling $15.52 for a total of $429.93, in accordance with <br />the LELS Police Officers Union Contract. <br /> <br />Council Member Hull stated this recommendation is according to the Police Officers Union <br />Contract. Assistant Clerk-Administrator Crane stated that is correct. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney thanked Assistant Clerk-Administrator Crane for research and answers <br />to his questions prior to the meeting. He read language from the Police Officers Union Contract <br />indicating: “Upon separation from employment with the City, employees with less than 20 years <br />of service, and leaving in good standing, will receive a lump sum taxable severance <br />compensation for all accrued vacation and compensatory time.” He asked for the definition of <br />“good standing” and why it applied in this case since the officer resigned during the probationary <br />period and was not in good standing. <br /> <br />Clerk-Administrator Ericson explained it is a matter of interpretation and potential for a <br />challenge. He stated the Council can argue the definition of “good standing” but based on all of <br />the facts, the City Attorney found it made more sense to follow the Union Contract language and <br />not make a determination this would constitute “not in good standing.” He stated that Council <br />Member Stigney raises a valid point; however, it would cost the City significantly more than <br />$429 if this matter is challenged and goes to court. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney stated “good standing” means everything is “a-okay” and the officer is <br />doing satisfactory work in his job. He noted the City uses two rankings, “satisfactory” and “not <br />satisfactory.” Council Member Stigney stated he understands that it could cost the City more if <br />challenged and asked if the City is addressing this issue (resignation during probationary period) <br />during contract negotiations. He expressed concern with setting precedence in making payment <br />when an employee is not in good standing by not completing the probationary period. Clerk- <br />Administrator Ericson stated that when the 2010 and 2011 contract is negotiated with the Police <br />Union, staff will see if that language can be incorporated into the contract renewal. <br /> <br />Council Member Mueller stated she does not want to jump to any conclusions and if the reasons <br />for the resignation cannot be stated, it is still not right to assume the employee did not leave in <br />good standing. <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Mueller/Hull. To Waive the Reading and Adopt Resolution 7521, <br />Approving Severance for Police Officer Kenneth Koss. <br /> <br />Council Member Stigney asked the record to show that “good standing,” as being applied in this <br />case, may be ambiguous and is being used as a potential settlement mechanism rather than <br />determining the employee’s performance. <br /> <br />Council Member Gunn stated she supports Council Member Mueller’s comment, noting the