Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council January 9, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 13 <br />• Osmonson to get the best guidance available. Mr. McCarty stated he would like references of <br />these two individuals. He asked whether staff asked for references. He also asked what is the <br />City Administrator's recommendation since the Charter indicates that the City Administrator is <br />the supervisor of all staff and makes the recommendation. Mr. McCarty stated that he may be <br />more comfortable if there is a recommendation of the City Administrator. He asked about the <br />levels of insurance and bonds, noting this is a public building, not a park building being <br />constructed with volunteers. <br />Building Official Osmonson stated she received reference letters for both Ms. Gove and Mr. <br />Hagedorn. She advised that the State Building Official said he does not give any personal <br />recommendations and their State certification provides that recommendation. Building Official <br />Osmonson stated she has a recommendation on Ms. Gove from the president of the Fire Chief's <br />Code Advisory Council for Mr. McCarty's review. Additionally in working with more qualified <br />engineer, Ms. Gove has been involved for many years to create the Fire Code and new provisions <br />of the Fire Code. Building Official Osmonson explained that the other companies she spoke with <br />are more than willing to do the plan review but it is not in conjunction with City staff. <br />Mr. McGarry stated the building inspections, as pertains to the State Building Codes, appears to <br />be very simple at first blush but it goes further than that to the structural issues. Such as, were <br />the proper materials used and were they installed properly, which involves architectural engineer <br />issues. He stated he does not see that expertise in this firm. He stated that the way the City is <br />• insured, somewhere along the line the taxpayer will pick up the bill if the proper expertise is not <br />in place should a recommendation be made to pass the building and then a catastrophe occurs <br />later. Mr. McGarry stated he has no idea of who these two individuals are or the extent of their <br />level of expertise. He stated he does not want to sound unkind but expects the Council to assure <br />that whoever they use gives good solid advise to the City's Building Official. <br />Mayor Marty noted the minutes to be approved tonight from the previous meeting contained well <br />stated conversations from when this item was first discussed. He stated he is not familiar with <br />the license that Mr. McCarty raised and asked what type of experience these consultants have in <br />this area. Mayor Marty stated Medtronic is not "knocking on the door with permits in hand" and <br />the City is not pressed for time so he wants to assure all the "T's" are crossed and "I's" are <br />dotted since there could be potential liability. <br />Mayor Marty stated he had not thought about the use of SEH and while they may not be involved <br />with this scope, an engineering firm may be able to check different areas. He agreed this is one <br />of the biggest projects the City will ever undertake and he wants to assure the Building Official <br />receives adequate training. He stated he appreciates that Building Official Osmonson would be <br />able to work with these two consultants but he would also like more information. <br />Building Official Osmonson advised that the second preconstruction meeting will be held next <br />week and the plans will be submitted by the end of January or beginning of February. She <br />advised that provisions in the Building Code do require special inspections for concrete and <br />• structural steel so an engineer of that field will conduct those highly specialized inspections. <br />