Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council March 13, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 12 <br />. the City Code can be modified and amended as future Councils dictate to be necessary. He stated <br />Staff recommends leaving the language in there as it is, and indicated that it does not preclude <br />Clear Channel from considering or requesting an additional 10-15 years or modification of the <br />Code to allow for an additional 30 year period. He stated it holds firm to what the Council had <br />negotiated in terms of the relocation agreement being a 30 year period. <br />Councilmember Thomas stated the height restrictions should remain at 35 feet. She asked what <br />change is required to not allow signs in the section north of Silver Lake Road on County 10. <br />Director Ericson stated the section of text relating to the area north of Silver Lake Road could be <br />eliminated. He stated it is not a zoning issue. <br />Mayor Marty referenced the statement regarding the Sign Ordinance Review/First Amendment <br />from the City Attorney, which stated in order for the sign ordinance to be safe from legal <br />challenges, it must not contain provisions to give unbridled discretion to City officials and should <br />not be content based. Mayor Marty questioned the billboards that were approved at the former <br />golf course, and noted if they were in the City, they were not to have alcohol or tobacco <br />advertisements. He commented that nothing like this is in the ordinance, and asked if it has to be <br />stricken. Director Ericson stated the City could specific the requirements upon Clear Channel <br />because it was the land owner and had a contract with Clear Channel, but the City cannot ban all <br />alcohol advertisements in the City. <br />• ed ecti n 1 i n al ins and asked if it should <br />Mayor Marty referenc S o 008.02, the definition of me de t s g , <br />be changed to read no sign with a message that is legible off of premises should be incidental. <br />He asked for an explanation. <br />Director Ericson stated this was a change in regard to elimination of the advertising context of <br />the commercial nature. He stated this relates to incidental signs that relate to the flow of traffic <br />on the property. He explained that originally there was some language that was meant to exclude <br />commercial advertising as a definition of an incidental sign. He stated the City Attorney <br />suggested eliminating the commercial or advertising aspect to the incidental sign definition. <br />Mayor Marty referenced the chart on Page 2, Section 6, and asked if the numbers indicate the <br />size of the sign. Director Ericson stated they did. <br />Mayor Many referenced the top of Page 3, and asked what the small notations were. Director <br />Ericson explained these are footnotes that talk about the height of billboards increasing to 45 <br />feet. He noted this could be stricken based on prior Council discussion tonight. He added this <br />would strike the entire section because it was the only change to the section. <br />Mayor Marty referenced Section 8, item F, and noted the line says: "...provided that one or more <br />of the following conditions are applicable." He asked what the following conditions are. <br />Director Ericson commented that they do not relate to the change in that section. <br />Mayor Marty referenced Page 4, Item B, that stated billboards must be located at least 250 feet <br />