Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council March 27, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br />• did not ever believe that the building would be self-sufficient. She stated there is still a Parks <br />and Recreation Committee, whether it be the YMCA or the City's own people, the City still will <br />be funding programming. Councilmember Gunn stated it would still be coming out of taxpayer <br />money even if there was not a building. She stated the City has always paid for that part of it. <br />She stated the Community Center is a City building, and the City will probably be funding part of <br />the Community Center for a long time, but hopefully the amount will be going down. She <br />suggested perhaps the City can get it to run even with membership dues. She stated the <br />Community Center needs to be brought back to belong to the community. <br />City Administrator Ulrich explained this step in the process is to ascertain how much of an <br />investment this really would be, and whether it justifies the cost. He stated this is the first step <br />towards another decision, which would be whether or not the City should go ahead with this <br />investment. He stated this gives us the cost estimates to give information to determine if it is a <br />cost-effective decision. <br />Mayor Marty noted that the Rozeboom Miller quote is identical to DSGW Architects at $5,000. <br />He noted that DSGW Architects did the North St. Paul Community Center that is comparable to <br />the Mounds View Community Center. He stated both proposals look comparable. He stated that <br />when reviewing the proposal from DSGW Architects, if Phase 2 is pursued for the <br />implementation (construction, administration and project follow-up), the fee percentage is 6 <br />percent compared to Rozeboom that has a fee percentage of 7.5 percent. Mayor Marty stated it <br />seems that the North St. Paul project worked out pretty well and if the project goes farther than <br />dust this study, he stated he would be more comfortable knowing ahead of time that the City <br />would save 1.5 percent of the costs by going with DSGW Architects. <br />Mayor Marty stated David Jahnke, 8428 Eastwood Road, called before the meeting and stated <br />Mr. Jahnke does not want the City to go forward with this. He wondered if this meant the <br />Community Center would be changing. <br />Mayor Marty stated this is to take a look to see if it is feasible and is not giving approval to <br />change anything at the Community Center at this time. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated he is comfortable with either architectural firm. He added that <br />Phase 2 is not being sought right now, and that cost may be negotiable with either firm. He <br />suggested he could go back and ask if Rozeboom Miller if they could guarantee 6 percent for <br />Phase 2, but if it makes no difference and the Council likes the design work of DSGW, he <br />commented he is fine with going with them. <br />Councilmember Gunn asked if there was any particular reason Rozeboom Miller was chosen. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated it was somewhat a subjective decision, and that he preferred <br />more of the design work and also that they had some higher profile work. He noted they were <br />also the only firm that came out and walked through the areas of the Community Center. <br />Mayor Marty pointed out in both of the reports, DSGW and Rozeboom stated the quote of <br />$5,000 is all-inclusive whereas SEH had meals and travel expenses that would be added on to <br />