My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2006/03/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Minutes - 2006/03/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 1:37:52 PM
Creation date
3/6/2025 1:37:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
3/27/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 27, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 13 <br />Ms. Amundsen stressed that Code i <br />s there for the public health and safety, and rt has been well <br />thought out for the protection and safety of the neighborhood and also to respect residents' rights. <br />She stated that she and Brian have gotten very familiar with the Code and have strictly followed <br />it in the past. <br />Ms. Amundsen stated it is Staff's job to admit if a Code violation was overlooked. She stated the <br />letter referenced the idea that there are other people doing this, and commented that this does not <br />make it right. She wondered if this type of thing has been allowed to go on in the community. <br />Ms. Amundsen stated she hopes that they were not dealt this way because of past issues with the <br />City, because it is plain and clear that there is Code that needs to be followed. <br />Mayor Marty asked how someone can pull a permit to build a fence and how it passed the <br />Building Inspector if they have not made a fence, but rather did grading work and put in a <br />retaining wall. <br />Director Ericson stated there may be a language issue involved in this situation. He stated when <br />the applicant made the application for the work, Staff went to the property and observed it was <br />not really a fence that was being constructed but rather a retaining wall. He stated the permit was <br />changed to be a retaining wall with associated grading. He stated the property owner was not <br />• sure what he was applying for. <br />Director Ericson noted Staff takes offense to the implication that something was overlooked or <br />that its integrity was being questioned for past issues with the property owners. He stressed the <br />City treats no property owners special, and that the Amundsens are wonderful property owners <br />and the City would hope that every property owner would have the same regard for Code. He <br />stated they are wonderful examples of what residents should be. He stated he was sorry the <br />Amundsens feel like they are being mistreated or being somehow punished for past issues. <br />Mayor Marty stated all residents will be treated the same regardless of past issues. <br />Ms. Amundsen stated the matter is frustrating and she feels like she is doing the City's job. She <br />stated she does not think it is fair and does not know why it is happened. She stated the neighbor <br />originally wanted to put up a fence. <br />Mr. Amundsen stated it is currently still listed on the permit as a fence. <br />Mr. Amundsen stated it is a clear situation that was brought to the permit office on August 24, <br />2005. He indicated that he was opposed to anything Located that close to the fence, and if the <br />neighbor wanted to proceed with something on the property line that was not a fence, a variance <br />would need to be requested through the Planning Commission. He indicated none of that process <br />was followed. Mr. Amundsen stated when he contacted Director Ericson in regard to the land <br />that was going to be filled in, Director Ericson indicated there was very little that could be done. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.