My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes - 2006/03/27
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
Minutes - 2006/03/27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 1:37:52 PM
Creation date
3/6/2025 1:37:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Commission Documents
Commission Name
City Council
Commission Doc Type
Minutes
MEETINGDATE
3/27/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View City Council March 27, 2006 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br />• Highway 10, Old Highway 8, north of the intersection of County Road 10 and Silver Lake Road <br />and south of the intersection of County Road 10 and Wooddale. He stated there was some <br />discussion at the last meeting about eliminating the locations of north of the intersection of <br />County Road 10 and Silver Lake Road, and that has been amended for the Second Reading, and <br />those locations are not part of the Ordinance. <br />Director Ericson stated there are issues associated with the locations on the south side of County <br />Road 10, specifically one area where the City is planning to put up a gateway sign as one enters <br />the community from the southeast. He stated there is some concern if there is a billboard sitting <br />on top of this sign or adjacent to it, there might be too much clutter or take away from the effect <br />of the gateway sign. He stated that Staff recommends further revising the Ordinance to eliminate <br />any spots on the north side County Road 10 south of Woodale. He commented there would be <br />three or four parcels that would be affected. He stated this change is not reflected in the <br />Ordinance yet. <br />Director Ericson explained the other change that is recommended is to restrict the height of the <br />proposed billboards to 45 feet, but only on Highway 10, I-35W and Old Highway 8. He <br />explained this would be conditioned on proper zoning. He stated the height restriction would be <br />35 feet on County Road 10. He explained this is not reflected in the Ordinance, so an <br />amendment will be needed for this. He stated if there are height issues, the City will look at <br />those issues on a case by case basis if there is a need for a variance. <br />• Director Ericson stated a re resentative from Clear Channel Outdoors is resent. <br />p p <br />MOTION/SECOND: STIGNEY/GLTNN. To waive the reading and adopt Ordinance 769, an <br />Ordinance Amending Chapter 1008 of the Municipal Code Relating to Signs and Billboards, <br />including adoption of the proposed changes made by Staff. <br />Councilmember Thomas indicated that there are several changes that are not reflected in the <br />Ordinance that need to be discussed. She asked for explanation of the language changes. <br />Councilmember Stigney asked for clarification on Item f. Director Ericson stated there are two <br />areas that would be changed. He referenced Page 3, Section 7, addresses height limitations by <br />district, where footnote 3 indicates the maximum billboard height is 45 feet. He proposed to <br />change the language to reflect that in the locations along Highway 10, Old Highway 8, and I- <br />35W that the height limitation can be increased to 45 feet so the underlying height limitation <br />remains at 35 feet. He stated it would eliminate the County Road 10 locations as being <br />appropriate for 45 feet, so those areas would remain at 35 feet. <br />Director Ericson commented that with regard to the locations that the billboards can be sited, he <br />referenced Page 4, Paragraph b, where "the south side of County Road 10" would be added to <br />explicitly state that it is the south side only at that location. He stated the map would also be <br />amended that illustrates the same change. <br />Councilmember Thomas stated the Council has not discussed the locations other than I-35W that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.